Abstract
Our understanding of contracts continues to evolve. Electronic contracts that have typically taken the form of shrink-wrap, click-wrap, web-wrap, scroll-wrap, multi-wrap and sign-in-wrap agreements have undergone further developments with the introduction of automation in electronic contractual engagements and, more recently, the advent of the so-called "smart contract". Different types of smart contracts exist, including smart contracts that operate on blockchain technology. Despite these developments in commercial and contractual activities, the South African legal framework does not officially recognise smart contracts. The use of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 2002 (ECTA) as a mechanism for the regulatory oversight of smart contracts in South Africa is, in its current form, woefully inadequate and limited in its application to smart contracts. Other jurisdictions, like the European Union (EU), have passed draft legislative and regulatory documentation called the Data Act to address smart contracts, whilst the UK Law Commission has provided recommendations to regulate smart contracts. As South Africa currently has no equivalent to the EU's draft Data Act and has not considered the operation of smart contracts in South Africa, the position in the EU and United Kingdom (UK) is considered in this paper to provide guidelines as to the aspects that it would be necessary to regulate in a South African context.
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Reference70 articles.
1. Bibliography
2. Literature
3. Bacon J et al "Blockchain Demystified: A Technical and Legal Introduction to Distributed and Centralised Ledgers" 2018 Richmond Journal of Law and Technology 1-106
4. Bourque S and Tsui SLT "A Lawyer's Introduction to Smart Contracts" 2014 Scientia Nobilitat Reviewed Legal Studies 4-23
5. Brownsword R "The Future of Contract Law: Three Conversations at the Cape" 2021 Acta Juridica 3-35