Abstract
A glance at political theory reveals a preoccupation with the corrosive nature of power, in particular with how to ensure that the governors are sufficiently accountable to the governed. Legislative oversight is a constitutional requirement in the South African system of government. However, poor performance, maladministration and a lack of accountability in various government institutions have continued to be a major challenge. In recent years the implementation of legislative oversight has proven to be a challenge, with findings of abuse of state power revealed by reports from the Office of the Public Protector as well as corruption scandals in procurement processes. This study examines the role of parliament in holding the executive accountable in line with the constitutional values of transparency, accountability and responsiveness. Apart from delineating the reach of parliament's powers and functions, the main thrust of the study, given the existing vicissitudes in our constitutional edifice, including the failure of parliament to hold the executive accountable, is on how to strengthen the institution of parliament in its oversight role.
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference55 articles.
1. De Ayala SP "FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting Needs? Politeness in Question Time" 2001 Journal of Pragmatics 143-169
2. De Vos P "Separation of Powers and the National Legislature" in De Vos P and Freedman W (eds) South African Constitutional Law in Context (Oxford University Press Cape Town 2014) ch 4
3. Labuschagne P "The Doctrine of Separation of Powers and Its Application in South Africa" 2004 Politeia 84-102
4. Madue SM "The Role of Oversight in Governance" 2013 Loyola Journal of Social Sciences 37-56
5. Madue S "Finger-Pointing and Second-Guessing: Executive Versus Legislative Oversight" 2014 Journal of Public Administration 860-875