Abstract
An inventory of wetland vegetation across the country generated a list of the most common invasive alien plants across South Africa. Many of the plants on that list do not correspond with the priorities in the programmes for alien control across the country, as they are not listed on a government produced list that guides the priorities for alien control. We explore the reasons for this situation. We argue that because wetlands are such important parts of the landscape, invasive aliens in wetlands are of special concern, and there should be more alignment between alien control programmes and wetland rehabilitation programmes. This alignment starts by considering the full number of species that form a threat to wetland habitats, but also considers which pesticides to use, erosion and recolonisation in wetlands, planting indigenous vegetation after aliens have been removed, and strategising by working from upstream to downstream. Existing alien control programmes for specific grasses (some relatively new to the country and in the phase of early detection) and floating aquatic plants may guide how to tackle the invasions of grasses and forbs that have been established in South African wetlands for an extended period of time.Significance:
Wetlands have a distinct set of alien invasive plants that affect their ecology and functioning and many of these plants are not listed as priorities in alien control programmes.
Many restoration projects have an element of removing invasive plants and revegetating. Wetland restoration and alien control need to be integrated to preserve water resources.
Funder
Water Research Commission
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference58 articles.
1. Van Wilgen BW, Forsyth GG, Le Maitre DC, Wannenburgh A, Kotzé JDF, van den Berg E, Henderson L. An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa. Biol Conserv. 2012;148:28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.035
2. Hassan R, Mahlathi S. Evaluating the environmental and social net-worth of controlling alien plant invasions in the Inkomati catchment, South Africa. Water SA. 2020;46:54-65. https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2020.v46.i1.7881
3. Galatowitsch S, Richardson DM. Riparian scrub recovery after clearing of alien invasive trees in headwater streams of the Western Cape, South Africa. Biol Conserv. 2005;122:509-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.008
4. Meek CS, Richardson DM, Mucina L. A river runs through it: Land-use and composition of vegetation along a riparian corridor in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv. 2010;143:156-164. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.021
5. Holmes PM, Richardson DM, Esler KJ, Witkowski ETF, Fourie S. A decisionmaking framework for restoring riparian zones degraded by invasive alien plants in South Africa: Review article. S Afr J Sci. 2005;101:553-564.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献