Affiliation:
1. Animal Production, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
2. Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Abstract
There is a general perception that ruminants produce large quantities of greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming. Sometimes percentages are quoted out of context. For example, the percentage quoted for developed countries indicates the greenhouse gas contribution from livestock is less than 6%, while that for developing countries is 40–50%. However, the reason for this relatively low contribution from developed countries is because of very high contributions from other sectors. Ruminant production also is in the spotlight as it is the world’s largest user of land and South Africa is no exception. Only ruminants can utilise areas of non-arable land where the vegetation is rich in fibre and convert this fibre into high-quality nutrients for human consumption. Foods from animal sources (including ruminants) are essential for the human diet, as they support early childhood and cognitive development. Many rural households depend on ruminants and these animals are central to the livelihoods and well-being of these communities. The negative effects of red meat on human health and the negative environmental impact of livestock production are overemphasised, while the higher bioavailability of nutrients from livestock source foods, which stimulates mental and cognitive development compared to vegetarian or grain based foods, is ignored. Here we estimate that livestock are responsible for only 4% of the world’s greenhouse gases through methane production. We also highlight that if the high fibre vegetation is not utilised by livestock, it will still produce greenhouse gases through burning or rotting, without any benefit to humans. Livestock source foods are important if global nutritional, educational and economic needs are to be met; and this message should be conveyed to the public.
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference22 articles.
1. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C. Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: FAO; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-7136-4-1
2. Gerber P, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkma J, et al. Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities [document on the Internet]. c2013 [cited 2020 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3437e.pdf
3. Scholtz MM, Van Ryssen JBJ, Meissner HH, Laker MC. A South African perspective on livestock production in relation to greenhouse gases and water usage. S Afr J Anim Sci. 2013;43(3):247-254. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v43i3.2
4. Opio C, Gerber P, Mottet A, Falcucci A, Tempio G, MacLeod M, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains - A global life cycle assessment [document on the Internet]. c2013 [cited 2020 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/i3461e/i3461e.pdf
5. Schönfeldt HC, Pretorius B, Hall N. 'Fish, chicken, lean meat and eggs can be eaten daily': A food-based dietary guideline for South Africa. S Afr J Clin Nutr. 2013;26(3)(suppl):S66-S76. https://doi.org/10.5772/67110
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献