Abstract
Flouride contamination of water is recognised as a serious challenge facing humanity. Consumption of water that contains excessive amounts of fluoride can result in fluorosis. Consequently, concerted efforts have been made to develop cheap, effective and green techniques/materials to remove fluoride from water, particularly potable water. Bone char prepared from bovine, swine, and equine bones has been used extensively in this regard, and is the most promising, cheap and green material for treating drinking water with high fluoride concentration, particularly in developing countries. However, research on bone char prepared from bones of animals in the wild, as well as those from domestic and semi-wild animals treated with antibiotics to enhance growth, has been scanty. Such research is important as the use of antibiotics may alter the composition of bones, and thus their potential as a green adsorbent to remove fluoride may be impaired. Furthermore, little attempt has been made so far to package char bones for easy application domestically, particularly in rural communities.
Significance:
Contamination of water by fluoride is a major problem globally.
Various techniques and materials have been employed for water defluoridation, including the use of bone char, which has several advantages.
Bone char prepared from bones of animals in the wild and those from domestic and semi-wild animals treated with antibiotics to enhance growth should be further investigated.
Cheaper and less elaborate processes and packaging are required to scale down the use of bone char at domestic level.
Funder
National Research Foundation
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Reference78 articles.
1. Nagendra Rao C, editor. Fluoride and environmental review. In: Bunch MJ, Suresh VM, Kumaran TV, editors. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environment and Health; 2003 December 15-17; Chennai, India. Chennai: Department of Geography, University of Madras and Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University; 2003. p. 386-399.
2. Tewari A, Dubey A. Defluoridation of drinking water: Efficacy and need. J Chem Pharm Res. 2009;1(1):31-37.
3. Baker B, Aldridge C, Omer A. Water: Availability and use. Publication 3011 (POD-04-23). Mississippi State University Extension; 2016.
4. Kumari S, Khan S. Defluoridation technology for drinking water and tea by green synthesized Fe(3)O(4)/Al(2)O(3) nanoparticles coated polyurethane foams for rural communities. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8070. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598017085947
5. Yihunu EW, Yu H, Junhe W, Kai Z, Teffera ZL, Weldegebrial B, et al. A comparative study on defluoridation capabilities of biosorbents: Isotherm, kinetics, thermodynamics, cost estimation and regeneration study. Environ Eng Res. 2020;25(3):384-392. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.097