Future of Carbon Storage in the Yangtze River Basin, China under Alternative Climate and Land-Use Pathways

Author:

Zhang Qi1,Zhang Guanshi2,Zhang Xiu1,Liu Dongsheng1,Fang Ruying1,Dong Na3,Wu Hongjuan1,Li Sen14

Affiliation:

1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.

2. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.

3. School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China.

4. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.

Abstract

While the Chinese government has put a strong emphasis on combating climate change and pledged to strive for “carbon neutrality” in the 2060s, it is fundamental to assess the likely evolution of carbon storage in China’s terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we conducted a simulation study grounded by recent empirical evidence and advances in modeling techniques to project the spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon storage of the Yangtze River Basin (YRB)’s ecosystem from 2015 to 2050. Two sets of scenarios were developed to analyze the plausible effects of land-use change, climatic change, and carbon policy on carbon dynamics. The results show that the estimated total carbon storage of the YRB’s ecosystem was 21.75 Pg C in 2015, accounting for about a quarter of the total in China. Model simulations projected an overall increase in carbon storage of the YRB’s ecosystem. Under the combined scenarios, land-use change and climate change contributed to total carbon sequestration by 1.45 to 2.02 PgC and 1.64 to 2.00 PgC, respectively. Under the carbon tax scenario, due to an increase in the extent of forest driven by different carbon regimes, the YRB was projected to absorb 1.26 to 2.32 PgC by 2050. Several regions had been projected under threats of severe carbon losses, including a few places with high present-day carbon density in the middle reaches of the YRB. Our results could provide a more complete picture of carbon sequestration potential of the YRB’s ecosystems, which could benefit the formulation of nature-based solutions.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference50 articles.

1. IPCC. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Cambridge (UK) and New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2013.

2. Challenges toward carbon neutrality in China: Strategies and countermeasures;Zhao X;Resour Conserv Recycl,2022

3. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Policy responses: Findings of the Responses Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment . Washington DC: Island Press; 2005.

4. Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China;Liu Z;Nat Rev Earth Environ,2022

5. Climate‐induced increase in terrestrial carbon storage in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3