Affiliation:
1. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ANTALYA SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we investigated the understanding of the consent forms used for invasive procedures in the urology clinic by the patients. It was evaluated which age and education groups could comprehend the consent forms used in our clinic.Material and Methods: In this investigation, we employed two intelligibility formulas proposed by Ateşman and Bezirci-Ylmaz for Turkish. In the study, 69 separate consent forms were evaluated.Results: An average of 62.02 points was obtained in the study after evaluating the consent forms using the Ateşman intelligibility index. This value indicates that a person with a 9 and 10th education level will be able to comprehend the text. The Bezirci-Yılmaz index yielded an average of 11.13 points when the same forms were analyzed. This value indicates that consent forms can be understood by those with a 10 and 11th grade education grade.Conclusion: In our study, it was found that the informed consent forms given to the patients before the operation were insufficient to be understood by the patients. Similar findings were obtained in previous studies in the literature. Each country’s own health literacy and education level should be taken into account when creating informed consent forms.
Reference12 articles.
1. 1. Goldbort R: Readable writing by scientists and researchers . J Environ Health. 2001, 63:40-1
2. 2. Walsh TM, Volsko TA: Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care. 2008, 53:1310-5
3. 3. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. (1975). https://stars.library.ucf.edu/istlibrary/56/.
4. 4. Boztas N, Omur D, Ozbılgın S, Altuntas G, Piskin E, Ozkardesler S, Hanci V: Readability of internet-sourced patient education material related to "labour analgesia". Medicine (Baltimore). 2017, 96:e8526. 10.1097/MD.0000000000008526
5. 5. FL R: A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948, 32:221-33. 10.1037/h0057532
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献