Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Regression Models in Predicting Hydrogen Production Process from Biomass
Author:
Bilgiç Gülbahar1ORCID, Gök Ali Emre2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK-MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ 2. NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK-MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, BİLGİSAYAR MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ
Abstract
The need for energy in the world is increasing day by day and various energy production methods are used to meet this need. Production of hydrogen from biomass is one of these methods. Hydrogen production from biomass is a promising process to produce hydrogen and energy which has advantages such as the ability to use sustainable energy sources like biomass and solid waste, being carbon neutral, and increasing energy independence thanks to the variation of resources and the availability of local resources. The catalysts used in this process which can be conducted in three separate ways, affect hydrogen and energy production positively or negatively. One of the most important steps in effectively acquiring the ideal amount of product is predicting the outcomes of this procedure. This article compares a support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF) model to predict how various inputs used to produce hydrogen from biomass will affect hydrogen output. Additionally, the effect of catalyst addition on hydrogen yield in biomass processes was examined. In this context, 57 experimental studies from the literature were selected as a data set. From this data, 90% was selected for training and 10% for testing. The outputs were evaluated according to parameters such as R2, RMSE and MSE. The results show that RF and SVR models can significantly predict catalyst activity and hydrogen production.
Publisher
Cukurova Universitesi Muhendislik-Mimarlik Fakultesi Dergisi
Reference40 articles.
1. 1. Jamro, I.A., Raheem, A., Khoso, S., Baloch, H.A., Kumar, A., Chen, G., Bhagat, W.A., Wenga, T., Ma, W., 2023. Investigation of Enhanced H2 Production from Municipal Solid Waste Gasification Via Artificial Neural Network with Data on Tar Compounds. Journal of Environmental Management, 328, 117014. 2. 2. He, M., Hu, Z., Xiao, B., Li, J., Guo, X., Luo, S., Yang, F., Feng, Y., Yang, G., Liu, S., 2009. Hydrogen-rich Gas from Catalytic Steam Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW): Influence of Catalyst and Temperature on Yield and Product Composition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(1), 195-203. 3. 3. Wu, M.-H., Lin, C.-L., Zeng, W.-Y., 2014. Effect of Waste Incineration and Gasification Processes on Heavy Metal Distribution. Fuel Processing Technology, 125, 67-72. 4. 4. Gao, N., Liu, S., Han, Y., Xing, C., Li, A., 2015. Steam Reforming of Biomass Tar for Hydrogen Production over NIO/Ceramic Foam Catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(25), 7983-7990. 5. 5. Irfan, M., Li, A., Zhang, L., Javid, M., Wang, M., Khushk, S., 2019. Enhanced H2 Production from Municipal Solid Waste Gasification Using Ni–Cao–Tio2 Bifunctional Catalyst Prepared by DC Arc Plasma Melting.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 58(29), 13408-13419.
|
|