Planning in Poland and Slovenia – Introduction to Comparative Analysis of Spatial Planning Systems at the Local Level

Author:

Čok Gregor1ORCID,Foški Mojca1ORCID,Zavodnik Lamovšek Alma1ORCID,Mrak Gašper1ORCID,Jopek Dorota2ORCID,Kochel Laura2ORCID,Szlenk-Dziubek Dorota3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Ljubljana

2. Cracow University of Economics

3. Institute of Urban and Regional Development

Abstract

The paper aims to compare the existing spatial planning system in both countries, their spatial planning laws, documents and planning approaches. It focuses on the level of land use and urban planning instruments at the local level. It addresses the administrative and procedural characteristics of the two countries as well as experiences and examples of best practices that can be shared in the future. The results presented show that the countries are quite similar in terms of both the planning system and the typology of spatial planning acts. There are clearer differences in the planning approaches at the local level and in the current challenges regarding the stakeholders' participation in the planning processes.

Publisher

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences

Reference23 articles.

1. Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., & Solly, A. (2021). Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology. European Planning Studies, 29(1), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295 DOI

2. Chmielewski, J. M. (2016). Teoria i praktyka planowania przestrzennego. Urbanistyka Europy. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.

3. Dekleva, J. (1999). Instrumenti regulacije prostorskega razvoja. In V., Drozg (Ed.). Ključni vzvodi urbanističnega in prostorskega planiranja na prelomu tisočletja: stanje in trendi: mednarodni seminar: zbornik referatov (pp. 27-38). Ljubljana: Town and Spatial Planning Association of Slovenia.

4. Faludi, A. (2004). Spatial planning traditions in Europe: their role in the ESDP process. International Planning Studies, 9(2-3), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356347042000311758 DOI

5. Gajšek, M. (2018). Prostorsko planiranje med državnim intervencionizmom in prostim trgom [Spatial Planning In-between State Interventionism and the Free Market]. In A., Zavodnik Lamovšek (Ed.). Prostorski načrtovalci 21. stoletja: 60 let KPP, 45 let IPŠPUP (pp. 39-44). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo Univerze v Ljubljani.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3