Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Human Geography and Planning Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
2. Department of Geography and the Environment University of Texas at Austin
Abstract
The study addresses two current issues in social geography: the modern reflection on the topic of agency and the possibility of introducing the notion of place agency. When discussing human-environment relations, geographers more often use the terms more-than-human or non-human beings and focus on the animal and plant worlds. However, the symmetrical or mutual relationship between humans and the natural environment can be linked to a question arises about the wider scope of the notion of place agency and understanding the phenomenon of place as an entity acting on its own rights.
Publisher
Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development,Urban Studies,Cultural Studies
Reference103 articles.
1. Adams, P.C. (2005). The boundless self. Communication in physical and virtual spaces. Syracuse: Syracuse Univeristy Press.
2. Adams, P.C. (2010). A taxonomy for communication geography. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510368451
3. Adams, P.C. (2017). Place and extended agency. In N.J. Enfield, P. Kockelman (Eds.), Distributed Agency: The Sharing of Intention, Cause, and Accountability (pp. 213-220). Oxford. Oxford University Press.
4. Adams, P.C., Jansson, A. (2012). Communication geography: A bridge between disciplines. Communication Theory, 22(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01406.x
5. Allmendinger, P. (2002). Planning theory. New York: Palgrave.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献