Affiliation:
1. Galgotia College of Engineering and Technology
2. Delhi Technological University
Abstract
Water scarcity is an issue that stems from the overconsumption and misuse of fresh water supplies, which leads to shortages and decreased quality of life. It most affects developing countries that do not have the infrastructure in place to mitigate these factors. Solar still become most suitable method for water purification in these types of places due to its cheapness and easily made from locally available materials. Current paper concentrate on a detailed techno-economic and enviroeconomic analysis of distinct configurations of active and passive solar distillation stills. Distilled water production, cost per litres, environmental cost comparison has been done between different types of passive and active solar still. Active solar still has a higher system cost compared to passive solar due to the addition of thermal energy by different components and mechanisms. Based on the results, minimum cost per litre is obtained for passive conventional solar still with the spherical ball as heat storage material and in case of active solar still, with PV module, reflectors, air-cooling technique are 0.0136 $/l and 0.0092 $/l, respectively. On the basis of energy, the highest environmental cost was found for AMSSFS air-cooled with evacuated mode (1456.38 $), while the lowest was found for active solar stills with N - Flat Plate Collectors (44 $).
Publisher
International Centre for Applied Thermodynamics (ICAT)
Subject
General Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics
Reference92 articles.
1. Y. Wada et al., “Modeling global water use for the 21st century: the Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative and its approaches,” Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 175–222, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-175-2016.
2. Audrey Azoulay and Gilbert F. Houngbo, The United Nations World Water Development Report 3, vol. 9781849773. Paris: Routledge, 2012. doi: 10.4324/9781849773355.
3. A. S. Richey et al., “Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE,” Water Resources Research, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 5217–5238, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1002/2015WR017349.
4. WHO and UNICEF, “Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2015 update and MDG assessment,” 2015. Accessed: Jun. 18, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.unwater.org/publications/whounicef-joint-monitoring-program-water-supply-sanitation-jmp-2015-update/
5. N. P. Cheremisinoff, “Handbook of water and wastewater treatment technonologies,” in Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies, Elsevier, 2002, p. ix. doi: 10.1016/B978-075067498-0/50001-2.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献