Comparison of Newton Raphson – Linear Theory and Hardy Cross Methods Calculations for a Looped Water Supply Network

Author:

Mujeeb Mujeebullah,Safi Lutfullah,Mirzazada Ainullah

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis between the Newton-Raphson and Hardy Cross methods for solving a looped main linear water network consisting of 4 pipes. The research findings demonstrate a high degree of unity between the outcomes obtained from these two methods, thereby validating their accuracy and reliability in solving water network equations. While the Newton-Raphson method shows faster convergence than the Hardy-Cross Method, both approaches effectively plan and analyze water networks. The analytical methodology employed in this study provides valuable insights into the applicability and efficiency of these methods in optimizing gravity main water networks. By combining the strengths of the Newton-Raphson and Hardy Cross methods, engineers and planners can make informed decisions to enhance the performance and sustainability of water distribution systems. The findings contribute to advancements in water infrastructure planning and design, aiming to ensure efficient and reliable water supply to meet the evolving needs of urban and rural communities.

Publisher

Kabul University

Reference23 articles.

1. Ackers, P. (1958). Resistance of fluids flowing in channels and pipes. Wageningen University and Research Library catalog. London, England. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/titel/297839

2. Alan, C. T. (2000). Water Supply, 5th Edition. IWA Publishing London. https://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=30986676253

3. Basica, A., & Tucciarelli, T. (2003). Simultaneous zonation and calibration of pipe network parameters. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129(5), 402-422 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:5(394)

4. Bruce. Munson., & Donald F. (2009). Fundamental of fluid mechanics, Sixth Edition. John Wiley & Sons. INC.

5. Campbell, A.T.et al. (1994). Identification of Odour Problems in the R. Dee. JIWEM, 8(1), 52-58 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1994.tb01092.x

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3