Affiliation:
1. Molecular Plant Physiology Group (A.B.C., M.R.B., S.V.C.) and Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology (M.R.B.), Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
Abstract
Abstract
In C4 plants, carbonic anhydrase (CA) facilitates both the chemical and isotopic equilibration of atmospheric CO2 and bicarbonate (HCO3−) in the mesophyll cytoplasm. The CA-catalyzed reaction is essential for C4 photosynthesis, and the model of carbon isotope discrimination (Δ13C) in C4 plants predicts that changes in CA activity will influence Δ13C. However, experimentally, the influence of CA on Δ13C has not been demonstrated in C4 plants. Here, we compared measurements of Δ13C during C4 photosynthesis in Flaveria bidentis wild-type plants with F. bidentis plants with reduced levels of CA due to the expression of antisense constructs targeted to a putative mesophyll cytosolic CA. Plants with reduced CA activity had greater Δ13C, which was also evident in the leaf dry matter carbon isotope composition (δ13C). Contrary to the isotope measurements, photosynthetic rates were not affected until CA activity was less than 20% of wild type. Measurements of Δ13C, δ13C of leaf dry matter, and rates of net CO2 assimilation were all dramatically altered when CA activity was less than 5% of wild type. CA activity in wild-type F. bidentis is sufficient to maintain net CO2 assimilation; however, reducing leaf CA activity has a relatively large influence on Δ13C, often without changes in net CO2 assimilation. Our data indicate that the extent of CA activity in C4 leaves needs to be taken into account when using Δ13C and/or δ13C to model the response of C4 photosynthesis to changing environmental conditions.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Genetics,Physiology
Reference50 articles.
1. Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy. New Phytol165:351–371
2. Badger MR, Price GD (1989) Carbonic-anhydrase activity associated with the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus Pcc7942. Plant Physiol89:51–60
3. Berry JA, Farquhar GD (1978) The CO2-concentrating function of C4 photosynthesis. A biochemical model. In DO Hall, J Coombs, TW Goodwin, eds, Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Photosynthesis. Biochemical Society, London, pp 119–131
4. Brown RH, Byrd GT (1993) Estimation of bundle-sheath cell conductance in C4 species and O2 insensitivity of photosynthesis. Plant Physiol103:1183–1188
5. Brownell P, Bielig L, Grof C (1991) Increased carbonic anhydrase activity in leaves of sodium-deficient C4 plants. Aust J Plant Physiol18:589–592
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献