Abstract
Objective. To analyze the results of AudBility's online screening in the elderly to assess its viability.
Methodology. The study included 40 elderly participants (mean age 67.4 years). They underwent online AudBility screening and completed a self-assessment questionnaire along with tests assessing seven auditory skills: sound localization (SL), dichotic digits task, speech perception in noise, auditory closure, staggered dichotic words test (SDW), temporal resolution, and temporal ordering. Descriptive data analysis considered AudBility's reference parameters: <50% = abnormal, 51-79% caution, >80% = normal.
Results. The tests with the highest frequency of abnormalities were SL and temporal ordering frequency (TOF), both with 22.5%. On average, these tests were considered as "caution" (SL = 72.75%; TOF = 67.5%). The self-assessment questionnaire had the highest frequency of "caution" results (52.5%), followed by SDW (35%) and TOF (32.5%). On average, the self-assessment questionnaire and TOF showed caution values (74.41% and 67.5%, respectively). SDW had normal average values (81.5%). No test showed abnormal average values.
Conclusion. Auditory screening using AudBility can serve as an entry point for assessing auditory and cognitive health in the elderly population, guiding referrals and therapies before in-person interventions.
Publisher
Fundacion Universitaria Maria Cano
Reference28 articles.
1. [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, br-pt (IBGE) [Internet]. Population projection [cited 2024/feb/2]. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/social/population/18176-population-projection.html
2. World Health Organization [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024. Deafness and hearing loss; 2024 Feb 2 [cited 2024/Feb/2]: [about 6 screens]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
3. Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol [Internet]. 2011;68(2):214-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.362
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) [Internet]. Rockville: ASHA; n.d. Central Auditory Processing Disorder [cited 2024/feb/2]: [about 30 screens]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/central-auditory-processing-disorder/
5. Chermak G, Musiek F. Central auditory processing disorder: new perspectives. San Diego: Singular Pub. Group; 1997. 374 p.