Fifty-Five Prompt Questions for Identifying Social Impacts of Engineered Products

Author:

Mattson Christopher A.1,Geilman Thomas B.1,Cook-Wright Joshua F.1,Mabey Christopher S.2,Dahlin Eric3,Salmon John L.1

Affiliation:

1. Brigham Young University Department of Mechanical Engineering, , 350 Engineering Building, Provo, UT 84602

2. Clemson University Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Fluor Daniel Building, Clemson, SC 29634

3. Brigham Young University Department of Sociology, , 2008 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602

Abstract

Abstract This article introduces 55 prompt questions that can be used by design teams to consider the social impacts of the engineered products they develop. These 55 questions were developed by a team of engineers and social scientists to help design teams consider the wide range of social impacts that can result from their design decisions. After their development, these 55 questions were tested in a controlled experiment involving 12 design teams. Given a 1-h period of time, 6 control teams were asked to identify many social impacts within each of the 11 social impact categories identified by Rainock et al. (2018, The Social Impacts of Products: A Review, Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 36, pp. 230241), while 6 treatment groups were asked to do the same while using the 55 questions as prompts to the ideation session. Considering all 1079 social impacts identified by the teams combined and using 99% confidence intervals, the analysis of the data shows that the 55 questions cause teams to more evenly identify high-quality, high-variety, high-novelty impacts across all 11 social impact categories during an ideation session, as opposed to focusing too heavily on a subset of impact categories. The questions (treatment) do this without reducing the quantity, quality, or novelty of impacts identified, compared to the control group. In addition, using a 90% confidence interval, the 55 questions cause teams to more evenly identify impacts when low quality, low variety, and low novelty are not filtered out. As a point of interest, the case where low quality and low variety impacts are removed – but low novelty impacts are not – the treatment draws the same conclusion but with only 85% confidence.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference32 articles.

1. The Social Impacts of Products: A Review;Rainock;Impact Assess. Project Appraisal,2018

2. Some Social Implications of Modern Technology;Marcuse;Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung,1941

3. Using a Product’s Sustainability Space as a Design Exploration Tool;Mattson;Design Sci.,2019

4. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;Cf

5. Advancing Sustainable Development: Emerging Factors and Futures for the Engineering Field;Burleson;Sustainability,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3