Experimental Evaluation of Geopolymer, Nano-Modified, and Neat Class H Cement by Using Diametrically Compressive Tests

Author:

Kimanzi Raymos1,Wu Yuxing1,Salehi Saeed1,Mokhtari Mehdi2,Khalifeh Mahmoud3

Affiliation:

1. Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73069

2. Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70508

3. Department of Energy and Petroleum Engineering, University of Stavanger, Rogaland 4036, Stavanger, Norway

Abstract

Abstract Cement is the prime barrier material to maintain zonal isolation during wellbore life-cycle. Different types of the cement have different performances on sealability. The primary objective of this study is evaluation of three types of cement systems, neat Class H, nano-synthetic graphite, and rock-based geopolymer cements, on interfacial bond integrity. Diametrical compressive tests are used on casing–cement–formation systems. Cement performances are tested in a conventional configuration (Berea Sandstone). A universal testing system is utilized to analyze the relationship applied load–axial strain and the digital image correlation (DIC) technique is used to generate the strain field maps. Based on the relationship and DIC results, bond strengths in different cement systems are evaluated. Additionally, microscope images provide insight explanations of the bond from micro-view. Based on the experimental results, failures of all cases initiate and propagate from the casing–cement interface. Then, radial cracks develop through the formation. This is because the mechanical interlocking bonds are formed only at the cement–sandstone interface to enhance the bond strength. The comparison of geopolymer and nano-modified cements with the conventional cement (neat Class H) shows that the unconventional cements have a lower maximum load and higher axial strain before failure of the samples. It indicates that both the two kinds of cements are more ductile than conventional cement and can support more deformation before the initiation of cracks.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Reference38 articles.

1. Identification and Evaluation of Well Integrity and Causes of Failure of Well Integrity Barriers (A Review);Kiran;J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.,2017

2. Physics and Mechanics of Primary Well Cementing

3. Development of an Advanced Finite Element Model and Parametric Study to Evaluate Cement Sheath Barrier;Patel;ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.,2019

4. Bustgaard, M., and Nesheim, M. H., 2016, “Model of Prediction of Cement Sheath Failure,” MS thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.

5. Assessing Mechanical Integrity of Expanding Cement;Patel,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3