Time-Resolved DPIV Analysis of Vortex Dynamics in a Left Ventricular Model Through Bileaflet Mechanical and Porcine Heart Valve Prostheses
Author:
Pierrakos Olga1, Vlachos Pavlos P.1, Telionis Demetri P.2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering School of Biomedical Engineering 2. Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences Virginia Tech, 219 Norris Hall Blacksburg, VA 24061
Abstract
The performance of the heart after a mitral valve replacement operation greatly depends on the flow character downstream of the valve. The design and implanting orientation of valves may considerably affect the flow development. A study of the hemodynamics of two orientations, anatomical and anti-anatomical, of the St. Jude Medical (SJM) bileaflet valve are presented and compared with those of the SJM Biocor porcine valve, which served also to represent the natural valve. We document the velocity field in a flexible, transparent (LV) using time-resolved digital particle image velocimetry (TRDPIV). Vortex formation and vortex interaction are two important physical phenomena that dominate the filling and emptying of the ventricle. For the three configurations, the following effects were examined: mitral valve inlet jet asymmetry, survival of vortical structures upstream of the aortic valve, vortex-induced velocities and redirection of the flow in abidance of the Biot–Savart law, domain segmentation, resonant times of vortical structures, and regions of stagnant flow. The presence of three distinct flow patterns, for the three configurations, was identified by the location of vortical structures and level of coherence corresponding to a significant variation in the turbulence level distribution inside the LV. The adverse effect of these observations could potentially compromise the efficiency of the LV and result in flow patterns that deviate from those in the natural heart.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering
Reference47 articles.
1. Bronzino, Joseph D., 1999, The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Vol. I, Chap. 29, pp. 1–15. 2. Edmunds, Henry I. , 2001, “Evolution of Prosthetic Heart Valves,” Am. Heart J., 141, pp. 849–855. 3. Hammermeister, K., Sethi, G. K., Henderson, W. G., Grover, F. L., Oprian, C., and Rahimtoola, S. H., 2000, “Outcome 15 Years After Valve Replacement With a Mechanical Versus a Bioprosthetic Valve: Final Report of the Veterans Affairs Randomized Trial,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 36(4), pp. 1152–1158. 4. Chandran, K. B., Cabell, G. N., Khalighi, B., and Chen, C. J., 1983, “Laser Anemometry Measurements of Pulsatile Flow Past Aortic Valve Prostheses,” J. Biomech., 16(10), pp. 865–873. 5. Chandran, K. B., Khaloghi, B., and Chen, C. J., 1985, “Experimental Study of Physiological Pulsatile Flow Past Valve Prostheses in a Model of Human Aorta. I. Caged Ball Valves,” J. Biomech., 18(10), pp. 763–772.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|