Affiliation:
1. School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 85 Fifth Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30308 e-mail:
Abstract
Searching for biological analogies appropriate for design problems is a core process of biologically inspired design (BID). Through in situ observations of student BIDs, we discovered that student designers struggle with two issues that bookend the problem of search: design problem formulation, which generates the set of conditions to be used for search; and evaluation of the appropriateness of the retrieved analogies, which depends both on problem formulation and the retrieved analogy. We describe a method for problem formulation and analogy evaluation in BID that we call the Four-Box method. We show that the Four-Box method can be rapidly and accurately used by designers for both problem formulation and analogy evaluation, and that designers find the method valuable for the intended tasks.
Subject
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference45 articles.
1. A Functional Representation for Aiding Biomimetic and Artificial Inspiration of New Ideas;Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.,2005
2. Biomimetic Design Through Natural Language Analysis to Facilitate Cross-Domain Information Retrieval;Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.,2007
3. An Engineering-to-Biology Thesaurus for Engineering Design;ASME,2010
4. Vattam, S., and Goel, A., 2011, “Foraging for Inspiration: Understanding and Supporting the Information Seeking Practices of Biologically Inspired Designers,” Proceedings of ASME IDETC Conference on Design Theory and Methods, Washington, DC, Aug. 28–31.
5. Biomimetics: Its Practice and Theory;J. R. Soc. Interface,2006
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献