Affiliation:
1. Cyber-ShARE Center, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968 e-mail:
Abstract
In engineering design, it is important to guarantee that the values of certain quantities such as stress level, noise level, and vibration level, stay below a certain threshold in all possible situations, i.e., for all possible combinations of the corresponding internal and external parameters. Usually, the number of possible combinations is so large that it is not possible to physically test the system for all these combinations. Instead, we form a computer model of the system and test this model. In this testing, we need to take into account that the computer models are usually approximate. In this paper, we show that the existing techniques for taking model uncertainty into account overestimate the uncertainty of the results. We also show how we can get more accurate estimates.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference18 articles.
1. Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications;ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng.,2015
2. Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Frames Under Interval Material and Load Uncertainty;ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng.,2015
3. Interval Fractile Levels for Stationary Stochastic Response of Linear Structures With Uncertainty;ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng.,2016
4. Interval Limit Analysis Within a Scaled Boundary Element Framework;ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng.,2015
5. Kuhn, D. R., Kacker, R. N., and Lei, Y., 2010, “Practical Combinatorial Testing.” U.S. National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), Publication 800–142, Washington, DC.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献