Predicting Knee Joint Contact Forces During Normal Walking Using Kinematic Inputs With a Long-Short Term Neural Network

Author:

Bennett Hunter J.1,Estler Kaileigh23,Valenzuela Kevin4,Weinhandl Joshua T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neuromechanics Laboratory, Old Dominion University , 1007 Student Recreation Center, Norfolk, VA 23529

2. Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN 37996

3. University of Tennessee at Knoxville

4. Department of Kinesiology, California State University , Long Beach, CA 90840

Abstract

Abstract Knee joint contact forces are commonly estimated via surrogate measures (i.e., external knee adduction moments or musculoskeletal modeling). Despite its capabilities, modeling is not optimal for clinicians or persons with limited experience. The purpose of this study was to design a novel prediction method for knee joint contact forces that is simplistic in terms of required inputs. This study included marker trajectories and instrumented knee forces during normal walking from the “Grand Challenge” (n = 6) and “CAMS” (n = 2) datasets. Inverse kinematics were used to derive stance phase hip (sagittal, frontal, transverse), knee (sagittal, frontal), ankle (sagittal), and trunk (frontal) kinematics. A long-short term memory network (LSTM) was created using matlab to predict medial and lateral knee force waveforms using combinations of the kinematics. The Grand Challenge and CAMS datasets trained and tested the network, respectively. Musculoskeletal modeling forces were derived using static optimization and joint reaction tools in OpenSim. Waveform accuracy was determined as the proportion of variance and root-mean-square error between network predictions and in vivo data. The LSTM network was highly accurate for medial forces (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 0.27 BW) and required only frontal hip and knee and sagittal hip and ankle kinematics. Modeled medial force predictions were excellent (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 0.33 BW). Lateral force predictions were poor for both methods (LSTM R2 = 0.18, RMSE = 0.08 BW; modeling R2 = 0.21, RMSE = 0.54 BW). The designed LSTM network outperformed most reports of musculoskeletal modeling, including those reached in this study, revealing knee joint forces can accurately be predicted by using only kinematic input variables.

Publisher

ASME International

Reference71 articles.

1. Global, Regional Prevalence, Incidence and Risk Factors of Knee Osteoarthritis in Population-Based Studies;EClinicalMedicine,2020

2. Osteoarthritis;Lancet,2019

3. Loading of the Knee Joint During Activities of Daily Living Measured In Vivo in Five Subjects;J. Biomech.,2010

4. Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement: National Projections From 2010 to 2030;Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.,2009

5. Estimating the Burden of Total Knee Replacement in the United States;J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol.,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3