Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 2: Application for Rans Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship
Author:
Wilson Robert V.1, Stern Fred1, Coleman Hugh W.2, Paterson Eric G.3
Affiliation:
1. Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, Department Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 2. Propulsion Research Center, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899 3. Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Abstract
Part 2 of this two-part paper provides an example case study following the recently developed comprehensive verification and validation approach presented in Part 1. The case study is for a RANS simulation of an established benchmark for ship hydrodynamics using a ship hydrodynamics CFD code. Verification of the resistance (integral variable) and wave profile (point variable) indicates iterative uncertainties much less than grid uncertainties and simulation numerical uncertainties of about 2%S1(S1 is the simulation value for the finest grid). Validation of the resistance and wave profile shows modeling errors of about 8%D (D is the measured resistance) and 6%ζmax(ζmax is the maximum wave elevation), which should be addressed for possible validation at the 3%D and 4%ζmax levels. Reducing the level of validation primarily requires reduction in experimental uncertainties. The reduction of both modeling errors and experimental uncertainties will produce verified and validated solutions at low levels for this application using the present CFD code. Although there are many issues for practical applications, the methodology and procedures are shown to be successful for assessing levels of verification and validation and identifying modeling errors in some cases. For practical applications, solutions are far from the asymptotic range; therefore, analysis and interpretation of the results are shown to be important in assessing variability for order of accuracy, levels of verification, and strategies for reducing numerical and modeling errors and uncertainties.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering
Reference15 articles.
1. Mehta, U. B. , 1998, “Credible Computational Fluids Dynamics Simulations,” AIAA Journal, 36, pp. 665–667. 2. Stern, F., Wilson, R. V., Coleman, H., and Paterson, E., 2001, “Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations: Part 1—Comprehensive Methodology,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, published in this issue, pp. 793–802. 3. Stern, F., Wilson, R. V., Coleman, H., and Paterson, E., 1999, “Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations,” Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, IIHR Report No. 407. 4. Paterson, E. G., and Sinkovits, R. S., 1999, “Performance, Scalability, and Portability of a MPI-based version of CFDSHIP-IOWA: Results of a NAVO PET Tiger-Team Collaboration,” 9th DoD HPC Users Group Meeting, Monterey, CA, June. 5. Paterson, E. G., Wilson, R. V., and Stern, F., 1998, “CFDSHIP-IOWA and Steady Flow RANS Simulation of DTMB Model 5415,” Ist Symposium on Marine Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics, McLean, VA, 19–21 May.
Cited by
210 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|