Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 2: Application for Rans Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship

Author:

Wilson Robert V.1,Stern Fred1,Coleman Hugh W.2,Paterson Eric G.3

Affiliation:

1. Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, Department Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242

2. Propulsion Research Center, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899

3. Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242

Abstract

Part 2 of this two-part paper provides an example case study following the recently developed comprehensive verification and validation approach presented in Part 1. The case study is for a RANS simulation of an established benchmark for ship hydrodynamics using a ship hydrodynamics CFD code. Verification of the resistance (integral variable) and wave profile (point variable) indicates iterative uncertainties much less than grid uncertainties and simulation numerical uncertainties of about 2%S1(S1 is the simulation value for the finest grid). Validation of the resistance and wave profile shows modeling errors of about 8%D (D is the measured resistance) and 6%ζmax(ζmax is the maximum wave elevation), which should be addressed for possible validation at the 3%D and 4%ζmax levels. Reducing the level of validation primarily requires reduction in experimental uncertainties. The reduction of both modeling errors and experimental uncertainties will produce verified and validated solutions at low levels for this application using the present CFD code. Although there are many issues for practical applications, the methodology and procedures are shown to be successful for assessing levels of verification and validation and identifying modeling errors in some cases. For practical applications, solutions are far from the asymptotic range; therefore, analysis and interpretation of the results are shown to be important in assessing variability for order of accuracy, levels of verification, and strategies for reducing numerical and modeling errors and uncertainties.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Reference15 articles.

1. Mehta, U. B. , 1998, “Credible Computational Fluids Dynamics Simulations,” AIAA Journal, 36, pp. 665–667.

2. Stern, F., Wilson, R. V., Coleman, H., and Paterson, E., 2001, “Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations: Part 1—Comprehensive Methodology,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, published in this issue, pp. 793–802.

3. Stern, F., Wilson, R. V., Coleman, H., and Paterson, E., 1999, “Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations,” Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, IIHR Report No. 407.

4. Paterson, E. G., and Sinkovits, R. S., 1999, “Performance, Scalability, and Portability of a MPI-based version of CFDSHIP-IOWA: Results of a NAVO PET Tiger-Team Collaboration,” 9th DoD HPC Users Group Meeting, Monterey, CA, June.

5. Paterson, E. G., Wilson, R. V., and Stern, F., 1998, “CFDSHIP-IOWA and Steady Flow RANS Simulation of DTMB Model 5415,” Ist Symposium on Marine Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics, McLean, VA, 19–21 May.

Cited by 210 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3