Mechanical Properties of a Biodegradable Bone Regeneration Scaffold
Author:
Porter, B. D.1, Oldham, J. B.1, He, and S.-L.1, Zobitz M. E.1, Payne R. G.2, An and K. N.1, Currier B. L.1, Mikos and A. G.2, Yaszemski M. J.2
Affiliation:
1. Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Bioengineering, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 2. Department of Bioengineering, Institute of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005
Abstract
Poly (Propylene Fumarate) (PPF), a novel, bulk erosion, biodegradable polymer, has been shown to have osteoconductive effects in vivo when used as a bone regeneration scaffold (Peter, S. J., Suggs, L. J., Yaszemski, M. J., Engel, P. S., and Mikos, A. J., 1999, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 10, pp. 363–373). The material properties of the polymer allow it to be injected into irregularly shaped voids in vivo and provide mechanical stability as well as function as a bone regeneration scaffold. We fabricated a series of biomaterial composites, comprised of varying quantities of PPF, NaCl and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), into the shape of right circular cylinders and tested the mechanical properties in four-point bending and compression. The mean modulus of elasticity in compression Ec was 1204.2 MPa (SD 32.2) and the mean modulus of elasticity in bending Eb was 1274.7 MPa (SD 125.7). All of the moduli were on the order of magnitude of trabecular bone. Changing the level of NaCl from 20 to 40 percent, by mass, did not decrease Ec and Eb significantly, but did decrease bending and compressive strength significantly. Increasing the β-TCP from 0.25 g/g PPF to 0.5 g/g PPF increased all of the measured mechanical properties of PPF/NVP composites. These results indicate that this biodegradable polymer composite is an attractive candidate for use as a replacement scaffold for trabecular bone. [S0148-0731(00)01203-6]
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering
Reference7 articles.
1. Vacanti, C. A., Kim, W., Upton, J., Vacanti, M. P., Mooney, D., Schloo, B., and Vacanti, J. P., 1993, “Tissue-Engineered Growth of Bone and Cartilage,” Transplant. Proc., 25, pp. 1019–1021. 2. Gazdag, A. R., Lane, J. M., Glaser, D., and Forster, R. A., 1995, “Alternatives to Autogenous Bone Graft: Efficacy and Indications,” J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., 3, pp. 1–8. 3. Peter, S. J., Miller, T. T., Zhu, G., Yasko, A. W., and Mikos, A. G., 1998, “In Vivo Degradation of a Poly(Propylene Fumarate)/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Injectable Composite Scaffold,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 41, pp. 1–7. 4. Peter, S. J., Suggs, L. J., Yaszemski, M. J., Engel, P. S., and Mikos, A. G., 1999, “Synthesis of Poly(Propylene Fumarate) by Acylation of Propylene Glycol in the Presence of a Proton Scavenger,” J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed., 10, pp. 363–373. 5. Piecuch, J. F.
, 1992, “Extraskeletal Implantation of a Porous Hydroxyapatite Ceramic,” J. Dent. Res., 61, pp. 1458–1460.
Cited by
89 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|