Affiliation:
1. Delft University of Technology
Abstract
The complexity of the cities’ layout and other public spaces, together with the large number of people involved leads to increased strain on the resources of emergency responders. An accident, such as a fire, remains a rare event so it is difficult for those in charge of preparing for an emergency and deciding on the acceptability of risk to get a picture of such an event. The interest of all emergency response agencies is to minimize the impact of disaster events on the entities of interest, which include first of all the human population. For this, there is need for a tool that helps the decision makers estimate the distribution of the fire outcome, given different information about the environment in which the fire takes place. This paper discusses the possibility of using continuous Bayesian belief nets for the study of the factors that influence the risk to which the people involved in a building fire are exposed, and how these factors influence the risk. The big advantage of Bayesian belief net approach is that it can model uncertain events. The distribution of the variables of interest can be easily updated given information about some of the other variables. Moreover, the intuitive visual representation of the problem at hand can help people to understand complex systems or processes, like a fire in a building. In this study, the approach is tested for a small example and the results are analyzed. The possibility of extending this method to a more complex model is discussed.
Reference22 articles.
1. Ramachandran, G., 1975, “Extreme order statistics in large sample from exponential type distribution and their applications to fire loss,” In: Statistical Distribution in Scientific Work, G.P. Patil et al., eds., Vol. 2, pp. 355–367.
2. Ramachandran, G., 1978, “Extreme value theory and large fires loss,” The ASTIN Bull., Vol. VII.
3. U.S. Fire Administration/ National Fire Data Center, 2004, “Fire in the United States 1992–2001,” Thirteenth Edition (http://www.usfa.fema.gov/applications/publications/).
4. Olenick
S.
and CarpenterD. J., 2003, “An updated international survey of computer models for fire and smoke,” Journal of Fire protection Engineering, 13 (2), pp. 87–110.
5. www.firemodelsurvey.com