Prediction of Ductile Fracture in Cold Forging of Aluminum Alloy
Author:
Kim Hong-Seok1, Im Yong-Taek1, Geiger Manfred2
Affiliation:
1. Computer Aided Materials Processing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 373-1, Kusung-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, 305-701, South Korea 2. LFT, University of Erlangen—Nuernberg, D-91058, Erlangen, Germany
Abstract
In this paper, the limitation and applicability of the ductile fracture criteria based on a work hypothesis and Cockcroft and Latham were investigated. For this purpose, experimental and numerical investigations for simple upsetting were conducted for aluminum alloys Al1100-O, Al2024-T3, Al6061-T4, and Al7075-T4. As a result, the fracture mode of each alloy was observed. The study was extended for pin-shape cold forging of Al1100-O and Al6061-T4 to compare the likeliness of fracturing according to two criteria. Based on experimental data of simple upsetting, the damage factors for the same two criteria were calculated by adopting rigid-viscoplastic finite element analysis. With this approach, the prediction of surface cracking was attempted by comparing the calculated limiting damage factors between simple upsetting and pin-shape forging. It was observed in simple upsetting that Cockcroft and Latham’s criterion gave a more reasonable prediction for crack initiation site than work hypothesis, but the limiting damage factors differ depending on the process. In spite of the differences, however, Cockcroft and Latham’s criterion might be useful in designing upsetting-like cold forging processes in which the influence of the induced circumferential tensile stress on failure is dominant.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference26 articles.
1. Alberti
N.
, BarcellonaA., CannizzaroL., and MicariF., 1994, “Prediction of Ductile Fractures in Metal-Forming Processes: an Approach Based on the Damage Mechanics,” Ann. CIRP, Vol. 43, pp. 207–210. 2. ASM, 1988, Metals Handbook, 9th Ed., Vol. 14, Forming and Forging, Metals Park, Ohio. 3. Cescotto, S., and Zhu, Y. Y., 1995, “Modelling of Ductile Fracture Initiation during Bulk Forming, in Computational Plasticity,” Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Computational Mechanics (COMPLAS IV), Owen, D. R. J. et al., eds., Pineridge Press Ltd., Barcelona, pp. 987–998. 4. Clift
C. E.
, HartleyP., SturgessC. E. N., and RoweG. W., 1990, “Fracture Prediction in Plastic Deformation Processes,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol. 32, pp. 1–17. 5. Cockcroft
M. G.
, and LathamD. J., 1968, “Ductility and the Workability of Metals,” J. Inst. Metals, Vol. 96, pp. 33–39.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|