Maximum Total Point Motion of Five Points Versus All Points in Assessing Tibial Baseplate Stability

Author:

Niesen Abigail E.1,Garverick Anna L.1,Hull Maury L.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616

2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA 95817

Abstract

Abstract Maximum total point motion (MTPM), the point on a baseplate that migrates the most, has been used to assess the risk of tibial baseplate loosening using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Two methods for determining MTPM for model-based RSA are to use either five points distributed around the perimeter of the baseplate or to use all points on the three-dimensional model. The objectives were to quantify the mean difference in MTPM using five points versus all points, compute the percent error relative to the 6-month stability limit for groups of patients, and determine the dependency of differences in MTPM on baseplate size and shape. A dataset of 10,000 migration values was generated using the mean and standard deviation of migration in six-degrees-of-freedom at 6 months from an RSA study. The dataset was used to simulate the migration of three-dimensional models (two baseplate shapes and two baseplate sizes) and calculate the difference in MTPM using five virtual points versus all points and the percent error (i.e., the difference in MTPM/stability limit) relative to the 6-month stability limit. The difference in the MTPM was about 0.02 mm, or 4% relative to the 6-month stability limit, which is not clinically important. Furthermore, results were not affected by baseplate shape or size. Researchers can decide whether to use five points or all points when computing MTPM for model-based RSA. The authors recommend using five points to maintain consistency with marker-based RSA.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Reference24 articles.

1. Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Causes;BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.,2018

2. Sixth American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Data;American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,2019

3. Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry;Acta Orthop. Scand.,1989

4. Early Migration of Tibial Components is Associated With Late Revision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21,000 Knee Arthroplasties;Acta Orthop.,2012

5. A New Model-Based RSA Method Validated Using CAD Models and Models From Reversed Engineering;J. Biomech.,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3