Assessment of the SSG Pressure-Strain Model in Free Turbulent Jets With and Without Swirl

Author:

Younis B. A.1,Gatski T. B.2,Speziale C. G.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, City University, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom

2. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681

3. Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215

Abstract

Data from free turbulent jets both with and without swirl are used to assess the performance of the pressure-strain model of Speziale, Sarkar and Gatski, which is quadratic in the Reynolds stresses. Comparative predictions are also obtained with the two versions of the Launder, Reece and Rodi model, which are linear in the same terms. All models are used as part of a complete second-order closure based on the solution of differential transport equations for each nonzero component of uiuj together with an equation for the scalar energy dissipation rate. For nonswirling jets, the quadratic model underestimates the measured spreading rate of the plane jet but yields a better prediction for the axisymmetric case without resolving the plane jet/round jet anomaly. For the swirling axisymmetric jet, the same model accurately reproduces the effects of swirl on both the mean flow and the turbulence structure in sharp contrast with the linear models which yield results that are in serious error. The reasons for these differences are discussed.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Reference27 articles.

1. Abid R. , and SpezialeC. G. 1993, “Predicting Equilibrium States with Reynolds Stress Closures in Channel Flow and Homogeneous Shear Flow,” Physics of Fluids A, Vol. 5, pp. 1776–1782.

2. Basara B. , and YounisB. A., 1995, “Assessment of the SSG Pressure-Strain Model in Two-Dimensional Turbulent Separated Flows,” Applied Scientific Research, Vol. 55, pp. 39–61.

3. Bradshaw, P., Launder, B. E., and Lumley, J. L., 1994, “Collaborative Testing of Turbulence Models,” Advances in Computational Methods in Fluid Dynamics, K. N. Ghia, U. Ghia, and D. Goldstein, eds, ASME, New York, FED Vol. 196, pp. 77–82.

4. Daly B. J. , and HarlowF. H., 1970, “Transport Equations in Turbulence,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 13, pp. 2634–2649.

5. el Baz A. , CraftT. J., InceN. Z., and LaunderB. E., 1993, On the adequacy of the thin-shear-flow equations for computing turbulent jets in stagnant surroundings,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 164–169.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3