Introduction of a Product Family Penalty Function Using Physical Programming

Author:

Messac Achille1,Martinez Michael P.2,Simpson Timothy W.3

Affiliation:

1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering Department, Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization Laboratory, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180

2. Northeastern University, Mechanical Engineering Department, Multidisciplinary Design Laboratory, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115

3. The Pennsylvania State University, Departments of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering and Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, 329 Leonhard Building, University Park, PA 16802

Abstract

In an effort to increase customization for today’s highly competitive global markets, many companies are looking to product families to increase product variety and shorten product lead-times while reducing costs. The key to a successful product family is the common product platform around which the product family is derived. Building on our previous work in product family design, we introduce a product family penalty function (PFPF) in this paper to aid in the selection of common and scaling parameters for families of products derived from scalable product platforms. The implementation of the PFPF utilizes the powerful physical programming paradigm to formulate the problem in terms of physically meaningful parameters. To demonstrate the proposed approach, a family of electric motors is developed and compared against previous results. We find that the PFPF enables us to properly balance commonality and performance within the product family through the judicious selection of the common parameters that constitute the product platform and the scaling parameters used to instantiate the product family.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference26 articles.

1. Wheelwright, S. C., and Clark, K. B., 1995, Leading Product Development, Free Press, New York.

2. Aboulafia, R. , 2000, “Airbus Pulls Closer to Boeing,” Aerosp. Am., 38(4), pp. 16–18.

3. Robertson, D., and Ulrich, K., 1998, “Planning Product Platforms,” Sloan Manage. Rev., 39(4), pp. 19–31.

4. Pine, B. J., II, 1993, Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

5. Pine, II, J. B. , 1993, “Mass Customizing Products and Services,” Planning Review, 22(4), pp. 66(8).

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3