Affiliation:
1. Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, P.R.C.; Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, P.R.C.
2. Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, P.R.C.
Abstract
A partial gasification combined cycle with CO2 recovery is proposed in this paper. Partial gasification adopts cascade conversion of the composition of coal. Active composition of coal is simply gasified, while inactive composition, that is char, is burnt in a boiler. Oxy-fuel combustion of syngas produces only CO2 and H2O, so the CO2 can be separated through cooling the working fluid. This decreases the amount of energy consumption to separate CO2 compared with conventional methods. The novel system integrates the above two key technologies by injecting steam from a steam turbine into the combustion chamber of a gas turbine to combine the Rankine cycle with the Brayton cycle. The thermal efficiency of this system will be higher based on the cascade utilization of energy level. Compared with the conventional integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), the compressor of the gas turbine, heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and gasifier are substituted for a pump, reheater, and partial gasifier, so the system is simplified obviously. Furthermore, the novel system is investigated by means of energy-utilization diagram methodology and provides a simple analysis of their economic and environmental performance. As a result, the thermal efficiency of this system may be expected to be 45%, with CO2 recovery of 41.2%, which is 1.5–3.5% higher than that of an IGCC system. At the same time, the total investment cost of the new system is about 16% lower than that of an IGCC. The comparison between the partial gasification technology and the IGCC technology is based on the two representative cases to identify the specific feature of the proposed system. The promising results obtained here with higher thermal efficiency, lower cost, and less environmental impact provide an attractive option for clean-coal utilization technology.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference20 articles.
1. U.S. DOE Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy, 1993, “Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program,” DOE/ASME Report No. 9309152.
2. Coal-Fired Combined Cycle Power Generation Technology With High Efficiency, Low Pollution, and Low Water Consumption;Cai
3. Performance Analysis and Comparison of Three Coal-Fired Combined Cycle Systems;Lin;Gas Turbine Technology in China
4. Combined-Cycle Power Stations Using “Clean-Coal Technologies:” Thermodynamic Analysis of Full Gasification Versus Fluidised Bed Combustion With Partial Gasification;Lozza;ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
5. Foster Wheeler Development Corporation, 2003, “Development of Pressurized Circulating Fluidized Bed Partial Gasification Module (PGM),” Department of Energy, Contract No. DE-FC26-00NT40972.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献