Human Versus Artificial Intelligence: A Data-Driven Approach to Real-Time Process Management During Complex Engineering Design

Author:

Gyory Joshua T.1,Soria Zurita Nicolás F.23,Martin Jay4,Balon Corey5,McComb Christopher1,Kotovsky Kenneth6,Cagan Jonathan1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

2. School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA 16802;

3. Colegio de Ciencias e Ingeniería. Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Campus Cumbayá, Quito EC170901, Ecuador

4. Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA 16804-0030

5. Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA 16801

6. Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Abstract

Abstract Managing the design process of teams has been shown to considerably improve problem-solving behaviors and resulting final outcomes. Automating this activity presents significant opportunities in delivering interventions that dynamically adapt to the state of a team in order to reap the most impact. In this work, an artificial intelligence (AI) agent is created to manage the design process of engineering teams in real time, tracking features of teams’ actions and communications during a complex design and path-planning task in multidisciplinary teams. Teams are also placed under the guidance of human process managers for comparison. Regarding outcomes, teams perform equally as well under both types of management, with trends toward even superior performance from the AI-managed teams. The managers’ intervention strategies and team perceptions of those strategies are also explored, illuminating some intriguing similarities. Both the AI and human process managers focus largely on communication-based interventions, though differences start to emerge in the distribution of interventions across team roles. Furthermore, team members perceive the interventions from both the AI and human manager as equally relevant and helpful, and believe the AI agent to be just as sensitive to the needs of the team. Thus, the overall results show that the AI manager agent introduced in this work is able to match the capabilities of humans, showing potential in automating the management of a complex design process.

Funder

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference40 articles.

1. Collaborative Creativity – Group Creativity and Team Innovation;Paulus;Handbook of Organizational Creativity,2012

2. Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Interaction Skills;Seat,1998

3. The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography;Horwitz;J. Manage.,2007

4. Team Diversity and Information Use;Dahlin;Acad. Manag. J.,2005

5. A Document Analysis Method for Characterizing Design Team Performance;Dong;ASME J. Mech. Des.,2004

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3