Derivation of Shear Rates From Near-Wall LDA Measurements Under Steady and Pulsatile Flow Conditions

Author:

Fatemi Ray S.1,Rittgers Stanley E.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-0302

2. Vascular Hemodynamics Research Lab, Summa Health Systems, Akron, OH 44309

Abstract

Atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and intimal hyperplasia are major forms of cardiovascular diseases in the United States. Previous studies indicate a significant correlation between hemodynamics, in particular, wall shear rate, and pathology of the arterial walls. While results of these studies implicate morphologic and functional changes related to wall shear rate magnitude, a standard technique for wall shear rate measurement has not been established. In this study, theoretical and in-vitro experimental fully developed steady and physiologic pulsatile flow waveforms have been used to obtain velocity profiles in the near-wall region. The estimated wall shear rates from these results are compared to the theoretical value to assess the accuracy of the approximating technique. Experimentally obtained results from LDA suggest that in order to minimize the error in velocity data, and subsequently, the wall shear rate, the first measured velocity has to be 500 μm away from the wall. While a linear approximation did not produce errors larger than 16.4 percent at peak systole, these errors substantially increased as the velocity magnitudes decreased during late systole and diastole. Overall, a third degree polynomial curve fit using four points produced the most accurate estimation of wall shear rate through out the cardiac cycle. Results of higher degree curve-fitting functions can be unpredictable due to potential oscillations of the function near the wall. Hence, based on the results of this study, use of a linear approximation is not recommended; a third degree curve-fitting polynomial, using four points provided the most accurate approximation for these flow waveforms.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3