Compressor Leading Edge Spikes: A New Performance Criterion

Author:

Goodhand Martin N.1,Miller Robert J.1

Affiliation:

1. Whittle Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK

Abstract

Compressor blades often have a small “spike” in the surface pressure distribution at the leading edge. This may result from blade erosion, manufacture defects, or compromises made in the original design process. This paper investigates the effect of these spikes on profile loss, and presents a criterion to ensure they are not detrimental to compressor performance. In the first part of the paper, two geometries of leading edge are tested. One has a small spike, typical of those found on modern compressors; the other has no spike, characteristic of an idealized leading edge. Testing was undertaken on the stator of a single-stage low speed compressor. The time resolved boundary layer was measured using a hot-wire microtraversing system. It is shown that the presence of the small spike changes the time resolved transition process on the suction surface, but that this results in no net increase in loss. In the second part of the paper, spike height is systematically changed using a range of leading edge geometries. It is shown that below a critical spike height, the profile loss is constant. If the critical spike height is exceeded, the leading edge separates and profile loss rises by 30%. Finally, a criterion is developed, based on the total diffusion across the spike. Three different leading edge design philosophies are investigated. It is shown that if the spike diffusion factor is kept below 0.1 over the blade’s incidence range, performance is unaffected by leading edge geometry.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Reference18 articles.

1. Andrews, S. J. , 1949, “Tests Related to the Effect of Profile Shape and Camber-Line on Compressor Cascade Performance,” Aeronautical Research Council, R&M No. 2743.

2. Blade Profiles for Axial Flow Fans, Pumps and Compressors etc;Carter;Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.

3. Experimental Flow in 2D Cascades;Lieblein

4. Leading Edge Separation Bubbles on Turbomachinery Blades;Walraevens;ASME J. Turbomach.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3