Evaluation of the Turbulence Model Influence on the Numerical Simulations of Unsteady Cavitation

Author:

Coutier-Delgosha O.1,Fortes-Patella R.1,Reboud J. L.2

Affiliation:

1. LEGI-INPG, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

2. ENISE-LTDS, 58, rue Jean Parot, 42023 St. Etienne, France

Abstract

Unsteady cavitation in a Venturi-type section was simulated by two-dimensional computations of viscous, compressible, and turbulent cavitating flows. The numerical model used an implicit finite volume scheme (based on the SIMPLE algorithm) to solve Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, associated with a barotropic vapor/liquid state law that strongly links the density variations to the pressure evolution. To simulate turbulence effects on cavitating flows, four different models were implemented (standard k-ε RNG; modified k-ε RNG; k-ω with and without compressibility effects), and numerical results obtained were compared to experimental ones. The standard models k-ε RNG and k-ω without compressibility effects lead to a poor description of the self-oscillation behavior of the cavitating flow. To improve numerical simulations by taking into account the influence of the compressibility of the two-phase medium on turbulence, two other models were implemented in the numerical code: a modified k-ε model and the k-ω model including compressibility effects. Results obtained concerning void ratio, velocity fields, and cavitation unsteady behavior were found in good agreement with experimental ones. The role of the compressibility effects on turbulent two-phase flow modeling was analyzed, and it seemed to be of primary importance in numerical simulations.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Reference23 articles.

1. Delannoy, Y., and Kueny, J. L., 1990, “Two Phase Flow Approach in Unsteady Cavitation Modeling,” Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, ASME, New York, 98, pp. 153–158.

2. Song, C., and He, J., 1998, “Numerical Simulation of Cavitating Flows by Single-Phase Flow Approach,” 3rd Int. Symp. on Cavitation, J. M. Michel and H. Kato, eds., Grenoble, France, pp. 295–300.

3. Merkle, C. L., Feng, J., and Buelow, P. E. O., 1998, “Computational Modeling of the Dynamics of Sheet Cavitation,” 3rd Int. Symp. on Cavitation, J. M. Michel and H. Kato, eds., Grenoble, France, pp. 307–313.

4. Kubota, A., Kato, H., and Yamagushi, H., 1992, “A New Modeling of Cavitation Flows: A Numerical Study of Unsteady Cavitation on a Hydrofoil Section,” J. Fluid Mech., 240, pp. 59–96.

5. Chen, Y., and Heister, S. D., 1996, “Modeling Hydrodynamic Non Equilibrium in Cavitating Flows,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 118, pp. 172–178.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3