An Empirical Study on the Impact of Design Brief Information on the Creativity of Design Outcomes With Consideration of Gender and Gender Diversity

Author:

Koronis Georgios1,Chia Pei Zhi1,Kang Kai Siang Jacob1,Silva Arlindo2,Yogiaman Christine3,Raghunath Nilanjan4

Affiliation:

1. SUTD-MIT International Design Centre, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore e-mail:

2. Engineering Product Development Pillar, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore e-mail:

3. Architecture and Sustainable Design Pillar, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore e-mail:

4. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Pillar, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore e-mail:

Abstract

This study aims to understand how information in design briefs affects the creativity of design outcomes. We tested this during a Collaborative Sketching (C-Sketch) ideation exercise with first-year undergraduate student designers. We focus on four types of stimuli—quantitative requirements, a visual example (video), a physical example, and contextual information—and we measure creativity according to three metrics—novelty, appropriateness, and usability with either the participants’ gender or the gender diversity of the participants’ groups. The findings suggest that the main effect of providing a video example results in high appropriateness and usability scores but low novelty scores and that physical-contextual briefs have high novelty and usability scores. In addition, we did not find any correlation between gender or gender diversity and creativity scores.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference53 articles.

1. Design Innovation: A Study of Integrated Practice;Camburn,2017

2. Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment;Carlgren;Creat. Innov. Manag.,2016

3. Design Briefs in Creativity Studies;Sosa,2018

4. How Designers Think

5. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking;Buchanan;Des. Issues,1992

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3