The Effect of the Design of Surgical Electrodes on the Formation of Sparking Enhanced Burns

Author:

Radmilović-Radjenović Marija1,Radjenović Dimitrije2,Radjenović Branislav1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Pregrevica 118, Belgrade 11080, Serbia

2. Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, Belgrade 11000, Serbia

Abstract

Abstract Electrocautery is a safe and effective method of hemostasis during cutaneous surgery. Despite the unquestionable benefits, electrocautery sparks in the surgical field represent a significant fire risk that can be eliminated by clarifying the causation and conditions of their development. Apart from the experimental methods, computer modeling is proven to be an effective approach to improve the performance of electrocautery. This paper is dealing with the design of electrodes to prevent burns during standard procedures. Simulations were carried out by using the comsol simulation package for various electrode configurations (cylinder-cylinder, sphere-sphere, sphere-cylinder, and cylinder-sphere) representing shapes of surgical electrodes. The primary goal was to determine the location where sparking starts. The obtained simulation results agree well with the experimental data taken from the literature supporting that the sparking formation is strongly affected by the electrode configuration. It was found that sparking occurs most easily when both electrodes are cylindrical. Also, the sparking mechanism depends on electrical asymmetry that results in undesirable direct current burns. Results presented here can be used to establish practices for the safe use of the electrocautery devices and to prevent injury to patients and staff.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference31 articles.

1. Comparison of Radiofrequency and Electrocautery With the Conventional Scalpel Incisions;J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg.,2016

2. Cutting Electrocautery Versus Scalpel for Surgical Incisions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;J. Surg. Res.,2017

3. Comparison of Pediatric Adenoidectomy Techniques;Laryngoscope,2018

4. Evaluating Nasal Cautery Techniques in Epistaxis;J. Laryngol. Otol.,2019

5. Laser Versus Electrocautery: A Split-Mouth Study to Evaluate Depigmentation;Case Rep.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3