Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Tech B224, Evanston, IL 60208-3111
2. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332
Abstract
In most of the existing work, model validation is viewed as verifying the model accuracy, measured by the agreement between computational and experimental results. Due to the lack of resource, accuracy can only be assessed at very limited test points. However, from the design perspective, a good model should be considered the one that can provide the discrimination (with good resolution) between competing design candidates under uncertainty. In this work, a design-driven validation approach is presented. By combining data from both physical experiments and the computer model, a Bayesian approach is employed to develop a prediction model as the replacement of the original computer model for the purpose of design. Based on the uncertainty quantification with the Bayesian prediction and, subsequently, that of a design objective, some decision validation metrics are further developed to assess the confidence of using the Bayesian prediction model in making a specific design choice. We demonstrate that the Bayesian approach provides a flexible framework for drawing inferences for predictions in the intended, but maybe untested, design domain. The applicability of the proposed decision validation metrics is examined for designs with either a discrete or continuous set of design alternatives. The approach is demonstrated through an illustrative example of a robust engine piston design.
Subject
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference42 articles.
1. DoD, DoD Directive No. 5000.61, “Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A),” Defense Modeling and Simulation Office (www.dmso.mil/docslib).
2. Confidence in ASCI Scientific Simulations;Ang
3. Overview of Structural Dynamics Model Validation Activities at Los Alamos National Laboratory;Doebling
4. Oberkampf, W. L., Trucano, T. G., and Hirsch, C., 2003, “Verification, Validation, and Predictive Capability in Computational Engineering and Physics,” Report No. SAND2003-3769.
5. Concepts and Terminology of Validation for Computational Solid Mechanics Models;Cafeo
Cited by
82 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献