Between Worlds: Exploring the Links Between the Tangible and Intangible Costs of Prototypes

Author:

Nelson Jacob1,Menold Jessica2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Penn State University, 134 Hammond Building, University Park, PA 16801

2. Department of Engineering Design & Mechanical Engineering, Penn State University, 134 Hammond Building, University Park, PA 16801

Abstract

Abstract Prototyping is an important part of the design process, but researchers currently have a limited understanding of how the resources invested in a prototype or designer teams’ intent for a prototype influence decision-making and perceptions of a prototype’s value. Prior work has shown that significant investment of time or money in design tasks can lead to design fixation, but little work has explored how these factors might impact design teams’ perceived value of prototypes with respect to the design process. Likewise, it is unclear how resource allocation and prototype intention effects the evolution of design team knowledge and subsequent design actions. To explore these relationships, an in situ study of prototyping tendencies was performed across two mechanical engineering design courses. Results suggest that effective design teams leveraged prototypes to uncover new design knowledge and limit uncertainty early in the design process. Importantly, this study did not find any significant relationships between the cost of a prototype in terms of money and time, and the perceived value of that prototype. Nor were any significant relationships found between costs and final design outcomes. Findings suggest that the true cost and value of a prototype with respect to design outcomes are challenging to explicitly quantify.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference63 articles.

1. Design Prototyping Methods: State of the Art in Strategies, Techniques, and Guidelines;Camburn;Des. Sci.,2017

2. Methods for Prototyping Strategies in Conceptual Phases of Design: Framework and Experimental Assessment;Camburn,2013

3. Perceptions of Prototypes: Pilot Study Comparing Students and Professionals;Lauff,2017

4. On Prototyping: Lessons from RAND Research;Drezner,2009

5. Case Study: Evidence of Prototyping Roles in Conceptual Design;Hess,2013

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3