Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Abstract
Traditional variation analysis methods, such as Root Sum Square method and Monte Carlo simulation, are not applicable to sheet metal assemblies because of possible part deformation during the assembly process. This paper proposes the use of finite element methods (FEM) in developing mechanistic variation simulation models for deformable sheet metal parts with complex two or three dimensional free form surfaces. Mechanistic variation simulation provides improved analysis by combining engineering structure models and statistical analysis in predicting the assembly variation. Direct Monte Carlo simulation in FEM is very time consuming, because hundreds or thousands of FEM runs are required to obtain a realistic assembly distribution. An alternative method, based on the Method of Influence Coefficients, is developed to improve the computational efficiency, producing improvements by several orders of magnitude. Simulations from both methods yield almost identical results. An example illustrates the developed methods used for evaluating sheet metal assembly variation. The new approaches provide an improved understanding of sheet metal assembly processes.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference17 articles.
1. Chase, K. W., and Parkinson, 1991, “A Survey of Research in the Application of Tolerance Analysis to the Design of Mechanical Assemblies,” Res. Eng. Des., No. 3, pp. 23–37.
2. Craig, M., 1989, “Managing Tolerance by Design Using Simulation Methods,” Failure Prevention and Reliability—1989, ASME Publ. No. DE-Vol. 16, pp. 153–163.
3. Early, R., and Thompson, J., 1989, “Tolerance Simulation Modeling—Tolerance Analysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation,” Failure Prevention and Reliability—1989, ASME Publ. No. DE-Vol. 16, pp. 139–144.
4. Greenwood W. H. , and ChaseK. W., 1990, “Root Sum Square Tolerance Analysis with Nonlinear Problems,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, Vol. 112, Nov., pp. 382–384.
5. Iannuzzi M. , and SandgrenE., 1994, “Optimal Tolerancing: The Link between Design and Manufacturing Productivity,” ASME Design Theory and Methodology, DE-Vol. 68, pp. 29–42.
Cited by
312 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献