Resilience Potentials for Health and Safety Management in Cobot Applications Using the Resilience Analysis Grid

Author:

Adriaensen Arie123,Bernabei Margherita4,Costantino Francesco4,Falegnami Andrea4,Stabile Sara5,Patriarca Riccardo4

Affiliation:

1. Sapienza University of Rome Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, , Via Eudossiana 18, Rome 00184 , Italy ;

2. Flanders Make@KU Leuven Core Lab ROB, , Heverlee 3001 , Belgium ;

3. Centre for Industrial Management/Traffic and Infrastructure , KU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Leuven 3001 , Belgium

4. Sapienza University of Rome Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, , Via Eudossiana 18, Rome 00184 , Italy

5. INAIL (Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione, Infortuni sul Lavoro) Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, , Piazzale Giulio Pastore 6, Rome 00144 , Italy

Abstract

AbstractThe increasing usage of cobot applications reshapes work environments and working conditions, requiring specific advancements in organizational practices for health and safety. Enterprises should shift from a technocentric risk management approach to considering cobot application as socio-technical systems, for which a resilience engineering approach is beneficial. This study presents an instantiation of the resilience analysis grid in cobot applications with the aim of measuring resilience potentials in terms of the four cornerstones of resilience engineering (respond, learn, monitor, and anticipate). The assessment has been provided via a questionnaire to 15 companies making use of cobot applications. Results revealed that companies mainly focus on the risk assessment of cobot applications with a traditional view of machine-centric safety, paying less attention to assessing contexts and process variables. This observation seems to arise mainly due to the lack of formally available safety methods or limited guidance from technical standards. Additionally, traditional industrial approaches to risk management lack monitoring of several risks that are essential for managing resilience, defined as the adaptive capacity of people, organizations, and human–machine systems. In addition, companies strongly rely on data from the cobot manufacturer for their safety assessment. The resilience analysis grid was confirmed as a valuable assessment tool for the participating companies to identify improvement areas and assess health and safety from a resilience engineering perspective.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering

Reference73 articles.

1. Collaborative Robotics: A Survey;Vicentini;ASME J. Mech. Des.,2021

2. Teaming With Industrial Cobots: A Socio-technical Perspective on Safety Analysis;Adriaensen;Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf.,2022

3. Evaluating Quality in Human–Robot Interaction: A Systematic Search and Classification of Performance and Human-Centered Factors, Measures and Metrics Towards an Industry 5.0;Coronado;J. Manuf. Syst.,2022

4. Robot Safety and You: Examples of Real-Life Accidents We Can Learn From;Association for Advancing Automation,2004

5. Kim, W. , 2020, “The Risk Analysis for the Introduction of Collaborative Robots in the Republic of Korea,” Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3