Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel
Author:
Thiele Jeffrey D.1, Melkote Shreyes N.1, Peascoe Roberta A.2, Watkins Thomas R.2
Affiliation:
1. The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405 2. High Temperature Materials Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6064
Abstract
An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effects of tool cutting-edge geometry (edge preparation) and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses for finish hard turning of through-hardened AISI 52100 steel. Polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) inserts with representative types of edge geometry including “up-sharp” edges, edge hones, and chamfers were used as the cutting tools in this study. This study shows that tool edge geometry is highly influential with respect to surface residual stresses, which were measured using x-ray diffraction. In general, compressive surface residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions were generated by large edge hone tools in longitudinal turning operations. Residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions generated by large edge hone tools are typically more compressive than stresses produced by small edge hone tools. Microstructural analysis shows that thermally-induced phase transformation effects are present at all feeds and workpiece hardness values with the large edge hone tools, and only at high feeds and hardness values with the small edge hone tools. In general, continuous white layers on the workpiece surface correlate with compressive residual stresses, while over-tempered regions correlate with tensile or compressive residual stresses depending on the workpiece hardness. [S1087-1357(00)00304-X]
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference39 articles.
1. Field, M., and Kahles, J., 1971, “Review of Surface Integrity of Machined Components,” Ann. CIRP, 20, No. 2. 2. Henriksen, E. K.
, 1951, “Residual Stress in Machined Surfaces,” Trans. ASME, 73, pp. 69–76. 3. Leskovar, P., and Peklenik, J., 1982, “Influences Affecting the Surface Integrity in the Cutting Process,” Ann. CIRP, 31, No. 1, pp. 447–450. 4. Brinksmeier, E., Cammett, J. T., Konig, W., Leskovar, P., Peters, J., and Tonshoff, H. K., 1982, “Residual Stresses—Measurement and Causes in Machining Processes,” Ann. CIRP, 31, pp. 491–510. 5. Liu, C. R., and Barash, M. M., 1982, “Variables Governing Patterns of Mechanical Residual Stress in a Machined Surface,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 104, pp. 257–264.
Cited by
134 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|