Affiliation:
1. Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK
Abstract
Boundary layer measurements have been made on the concave surfaces of two constant curvature blades using hot wire anemometry. All the current experiments were performed with negligible streamwise pressure gradient. Grids were used to produce a range of freestream turbulence levels between 1% and 4%. The freestream velocity increases with distance from a concave wall according to the free vortex condition making the determination of the boundary layer edge difficult. A flat plate equivalent boundary layer procedure was adopted, therefore, to overcome this problem. The Taylor–Goertler (TG) vortices resulting from the concave curvature were found to make the laminar and turbulent boundary layer profiles fuller and to increase the skin friction coeffiicent by up to 40% compared with flat plate values. This leads to a more rapid growth in boundary layer thickness. The evolution in the intermittency through transition is very similar to that for a flat plate, however, the shape factors are depressed slightly throughout the flow due to the fuller velocity profiles. For all the current experiments, curvature promoted transition. This was very marked at low freestream turbulence level but remained significant even at the highest levels. It appears that the velocity fluctuations associated with the TG vortices enhance the freestream turbulence resulting in a higher effective turbulence level. A new empirical correlation for start of transition based on this premise is presented. The ratio of end to start of transition momentum thickness Reynolds numbers was found to be approximately constant.
Reference21 articles.
1. Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient and Flow History;Abu-Ghannam;J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
2. A Physical model for Bypass Transition;Johnson;Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
3. Transition length prediction for flows with rapidly changing pressure gradients;Solomon;ASME J. Turbomach.
4. Vicedo, J., Vilmin, S., Dawes, W. N., and Savill, A. M., 2003, “Intermittency Transport Modeling of Separated Flow Transition,” ASME paper GT-2003-38719.
5. Redford, J. A., and Johnson, M. W., “Predicting transitional separation bubbles,” ASME paper GT-2004-53353.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献