Numerical Simulations of Flow in Cerebral Aneurysms: Comparison of CFD Results and In Vivo MRI Measurements

Author:

Rayz Vitaliy L.1,Boussel Loic2,Acevedo-Bolton Gabriel1,Martin Alastair J.3,Young William L.4,Lawton Michael T.5,Higashida Randall5,Saloner David6

Affiliation:

1. Radiology Service, VA Medical Center - San Francisco, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121

2. Radiology Service, VA Medical Center - San Francisco, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121; Créatis-LRMN (LB, PCD), UMR CNRS 5515, INSERM U630, Lyon, France

3. Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143

4. Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, and Department of Neurological Surgery and Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110

5. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110

6. Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143; Vascular Imaging Research Center, VA Medical Center - San Francisco, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods can be used to compute the velocity field in patient-specific vascular geometries for pulsatile physiological flow. Those simulations require geometric and hemodynamic boundary values. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that CFD models constructed from patient-specific magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and velocimetry data predict flow fields that are in good agreement with in vivo measurements and therefore can provide valuable information for clinicians. The effect of the inlet flow rate conditions on calculated velocity fields was investigated. We assessed the internal consistency of our approach by comparing CFD predictions of the in-plane velocity field to the corresponding in vivo MR velocimetry measurements. Patient-specific surface models of four basilar artery aneurysms were constructed from contrast-enhanced MR angiography data. CFD simulations were carried out in those models using patient-specific flow conditions extracted from MR velocity measurements of flow in the inlet vessels. The simulation results computed for slices through the vasculature of interest were compared with in-plane velocity measurements acquired with phase-contrast MR imaging in vivo. The sensitivity of the flow fields to inlet flow ratio variations was assessed by simulating five different inlet flow scenarios for each of the basilar aneurysm models. In the majority of cases, altering the inlet flow ratio caused major changes in the flow fields predicted in the aneurysm. A good agreement was found between the flow fields measured in vivo using the in-plane MR velocimetry technique and those predicted with CFD simulations. The study serves to demonstrate the consistency and reliability of both MR imaging and numerical modeling methods. The results demonstrate the clinical relevance of computational models and suggest that realistic patient-specific flow conditions are required for numerical simulations of the flow in aneurysmal blood vessels.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Reference49 articles.

1. Computer Modeling of Intracranial Saccular and Lateral Aneurysms for the Study of Their Hemodynamics;Burleson;Neurosurgery

2. Saccular Aneurysm Formation in Curved and Bifurcating Arteries;Foutrakis;AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.

3. Aneurysm Hemodynamics: An Experimental Study;Strother;AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.

4. The Influence of Hemodynamic Stress Factors on Intracranial Aneurysm Formation;Turner;J. Neurosurg.

5. A Three-Dimensional Cerebrovascular Flow Phantom;Fahrig;Med. Phys.

Cited by 79 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3