A Technoeconomic Analysis of Different Options for Cogenerating Power in Hydrogen Plants Based on Natural Gas Reforming

Author:

Corradetti Alessandro1,Desideri Umberto1

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy

Abstract

Steam methane reforming is the most common process for producing hydrogen in the world. It currently represents the most efficient and mature technology for this purpose. However, because of the high investment costs, this technology is only convenient for large sizes. Furthermore, the cooling of syngas and flue gas produce a great amount of excess steam, which is usually transferred outside the process, for heating purposes or industrial applications. The opportunity of using this additional steam to generate electric power has been studied in this paper. In particular, different power plant schemes have been analyzed, including (i) a Rankine cycle, (ii) a gas turbine simple cycle, and (iii) a gas-steam combined cycle. These configurations have been investigated with the additional feature of CO2 capture and sequestration. The reference plant has been modeled according to state-of-the-art of commercial hydrogen plants: it includes a prereforming reactor, two shift reactors, and a pressure swing adsorption unit for hydrogen purification. The plant has a conversion efficiency of ∼75% and produces 145,000Sm3∕hr of hydrogen (equivalent to 435MW on the lower-heating-volume basis) and 63t∕hr of superheated steam. The proposed power plants generate, respectively, 22MW (i), 36MW (ii), and 87MW (iii) without CO2 capture. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the optimum size for each configuration and to investigate the influence of some parameters, such as electricity, natural gas, and steam costs.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Reference33 articles.

1. CO2 Capture and Removal System for a Gas-Steam Combined Cycle;Desideri

2. Comparison of Two CO2 Removal in Combined Cycle Power Plants;Bolland;Energy Convers. Manage.

3. Lurgi Oel Gas Chemie GmbH, “Hydrogen,” newsletter available at: www.lurgi.de/lurgi-headoffice-kopie/english/nbsp/menu/media/newsletter/hydrogen.pdf

4. Haldor Topsoe, www.haldortopsoe.com

5. Consider Using Hydrogen Plants to Cogenerate Power Needs;Terrible;Hydrocarbon Process.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3