Affiliation:
1. Imperial College of Science, Technology, & Medicine, Mechanical Engineering Department, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom
Abstract
The paper describes the theory and the numerical implementation of a three-dimensional finite volume scheme for the solution of the linearized, unsteady Favre-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for turbomachinery applications. A further feature is the use of mixed element grids, consisting of triangles and quadrilaterals in two dimensions, and of tetrahedra, triangular prisms, and hexahedra in three dimensions. The linearized unsteady viscous flow equations are derived by assuming small harmonic perturbations from a steady-state flow and the resulting equations are solved using a pseudo-time marching technique. Such an approach enables the same numerical algorithm to be used for both the nonlinear steady and the linearized unsteady flow computations. The important features of the work are the discretization of the flow domain via a single, unified edge-data structure for mixed element meshes, the use of a Laplacian operator, which results in a nearest neighbor stencil, and the full linearization of the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model. Four different test cases are presented for the validation of the proposed method. The first one is a comparison against the classical subsonic flat plate cascade theory, the so-called LINSUB benchmark. The aim of the second test case is to check the computational results against the asymptotic analytical solution derived by Lighthill for an unsteady laminar flow. The third test case examines the implications of using inviscid, frozen-turbulence, and fully turbulent models when linearizing the unsteady flow over a transonic turbine blade, the so-called 11th International Standard Configuration. The final test case is a rotor/stator interaction, which not only checks the validity of the formulation for a three-dimensional example, but also highlights other issues, such as the need to linearize the wall functions. Detailed comparisons were carried out against measured steady and unsteady flow data for the last two cases and good overall agreement was obtained.
Reference39 articles.
1. Whitehead, D. S., 1987, “Classical 2D methods,” in: AGARD Manual on Aeroelasticity in Axial-Flow Turbomachines, Unsteady Turbomachinery Aerodynamics, Vol. 1, pp. 3.1–3.30. AGARD-AG-297.
2. Verdon, J. M.
, 1993, “Review of Unsteady Aerodynamics Methods for Turbomachinery Aeroelastic and Aeroacoustic Applications,” AIAA J., 31, pp. 235–250.
3. Marshall, J. G., and Imregun, M., 1996, “A Review of Aeroelasticity Methods With Emphasis on Turbomachinery Applications,” J. Fluids Struct., 10, pp. 237–267.
4. Smith, S. N., 1972, “Discrete Frequency Sound Generation in Axial Flow Turbomachines,” Technical Report 3709, Cambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge, UK.
5. Erdos, J. I., Alzner, E., and McNally, W., 1977, “Numerical Solution of Periodic Transonic Flow Through a Fan Stage,” AIAA J., 15, pp. 1559–1568.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献