Enhancing the Accuracy of Vertical Ground Reaction Force Measurement During Walking Using Pressure-Measuring Insoles

Author:

DeBerardinis Jessica1,Trabia Mohamed B.2,Dufek Janet S.3,Le Gall Yann4,Da Silva Sacoto Nicolas5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Box 454027, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Box 4005, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154

3. School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Box 3034, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154

4. École Supérieure d'Électronique de l'Ouest, 10 Boulevard Jean Jeanneteau, Angers 49100, France

5. École Supérieure d'Électronique de l'Ouest, 10 Boulevard Jean Jeanneteau, Angers 49100, France; Commission des Titres d'Ingenieur (CTI), 44 Rue Cambronne, Paris 75015, France

Abstract

Abstract Pressure-measuring insoles can be an attractive tool for measuring ground reaction force (GRF) since they are portable and can record multiple consecutive steps. Several researchers have, however, observed that these insoles are less accurate than instrumented force platforms. To address this issue, the authors identified transfer functions that best described each insole size to enhance the measurements of the vertical component of GRF during walking. GRF data were collected from 29 participants (6/23 male/female, 24.3 ± 6.7 yrs, 70.4 ± 23.9 kg, 1.66 ± 0.11 m) using Medilogic® pressure-measuring insoles and Kistler® force platforms for three walking trials. Participants provided the institutionally approved written consent (IRB #724468). The data from both instruments were preprocessed. A subset of the data was used to train the system identification toolbox (matlab) to identify the coefficients of several candidate transfer functions for each insole size. The resulting transfer functions were compared using all available data for each insole to assess which one modified the insole data to be closer to that of the force platform. All tested transfer functions moved the vertical component of GRF closer to the corresponding force platform data. Each insole size had a specific transfer model that that yielded the best results. Using system identification techniques produced transfer functions that, when using insole data of the vertical component of GRF as input, produced output that is comparable to the corresponding measurement using an instrumented force platform.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Reference36 articles.

1. A Comparison of Vertical Force and Temporal Parameters Produced by an in-Shoe Pressure Measuring System and a Force Platform;Clin. Biomech.,2001

2. Comparison of Ground Reaction Forces Measured With a Force Plate, FScan and Multiple Individual Force Sensors,2002

3. Assessing the Validity of Pressure-Measuring Insoles in Quantifying Gait Variables;J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng.,2018

4. Observations on the F-Scan in-Shoe Pressure Measuring System;Clin. Biomech.,1996

5. Validation of F-Scan Pressure Sensor System: A Technical Note;J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3