Geopolymers as an Alternative for Oil Well Cementing Applications: A Review of Advantages and Concerns
Author:
Khalifeh Mahmoud1, Saasen Arild1, Hodne Helge1, Godøy Rune2, Vrålstad Torbjørn3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Energy and Petroleum Engineering, University of Stavanger, Stavanger 4036, Norway e-mail: 2. R&D Department, Statoil, Stavanger 4036, Norway e-mail: 3. SINTEF Petroleum, SINTEF Industry, Trondheim 4036, Norway e-mail:
Abstract
Geopolymers, being inorganic polymers created from rock sources, were evaluated as an alternative to Portland cement. To evaluate their usability, some properties of a selected geopolymer were measured and compared with those from a neat class G Portland cement. The geopolymeric slurries showed a non-Newtonian viscosity behavior with a measurable, albeit low, yield stress. The pumpability measurements using atmospheric and pressurized consistometer showed an adequate set profile for both the geopolymer and cement sample. Static fluid loss test shows that the geopolymeric slurries experienced a lower fluid loss compared to that of the Portland cement. The shrinkage factor for the geopolymers was reduced (expanded) as the downhole temperature was ramped up. The shrinkage of the Portland cement sample proceeded only with a lower rate. Tensile strength of the geopolymers was approximately 5% of their compressive strength; however, this value for Portland cement was approximately 10% of its compressive strength. Finally, shear bond strength of geopolymers would benefit from improvement.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference21 articles.
1. Baret, J. F., 1988, “Why Cement Fluid Loss Additives are Necessary,” International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Tianjin, China, Nov. 1–4, SPE Paper No. SPE-17630.10.2118/17630-MS 2. Nishikawa, S., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 2002, “Transient Pressure Unloading—A Model of Hydrostatic Pressure Loss in Wells After Cement Placement,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sept. 29–Oct. 2, San Antonio, TX, SPE Paper No. SPE-77754-MS.10.2118/77754-MS 3. Oyarhossein, M., and Dusseault, M. B., 2015, “Wellbore Stress Changes and Microannulus Development Because of Cement Shrinkage,” 49th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, June 28–July 1, SPE Paper No. ARMA-2015-118.https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ARMA-2015-118 4. Emilio, C. C. M., Jandhyala, K. S. R., Bardapurkar, S., Rao Palla, V. G., Ravi, K., Singh, S., and Pearl, W., 2016, “Measurement Procedures and Analysis of Fluid Invasion Drivers During Cement Hydration,” Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 2–5, SPE Paper No. OTC-26944-MS.10.4043/26944-MS 5. Todorovic, J., Gawel, K., Lavrov, A., and Torsaeter, M., 2016, “Integrity of Downscaled Well Models Subject to Cooling,” SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, Apr. 20, SPE Paper No. SPE-180052-MS.10.2118/180052-MS
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|