Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Ohkubo, Urawa, Saitama, 338-8570, Japan
2. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England
Abstract
The effect of the magnitude of vertical vibration on the dynamic response of the seated human body has been investigated. Eight male subjects were exposed to random vibration in the 0.5 to 20 Hz frequency range at five magnitudes: 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 ms−2 r.m.s. The dynamic responses of the body were measured at eight locations: at the first, fifth, and tenth thoracic vertebrae (T1, T5, T10), at the first, third, and fifth lumbar vertebrae (L1, L3, L5) and at the pelvis (the posterior-superior iliac spine). At each location, the motions on the body surface were measured in the three orthogonal axes within the sagittal plane (i.e., the vertical, fore-and-aft, and pitch axes). The force at the seat surface was also measured. Frequency response functions (i.e., transmissibilities and apparent mass) were used to represent the responses of the body. Non-linear characteristics were observed in the apparent mass and in the transmissibilities to most measurement locations. Resonance frequencies in the frequency response functions decreased with increases in the vibration magnitude (e.g. for the vertical transmissibility to L3, a reduction from 6.25 to 4.75 Hz when the vibration magnitude increased from 0.125 to 2.0 ms−2 r.m.s.). The transmission of vibration within the spine also showed some evidence of a non-linear characteristic. It can be concluded from this study that the dynamic responses of seated subjects are clearly non-linear with respect to vibration magnitude, whereas previous studies have reported inconsistent conclusions. More understanding of the dependence on vibration magnitude of both the dynamic responses of the soft tissues of the body and the muscle activity (voluntary and involuntary) is required to identify the causes of the non-linear characteristics observed in this study.
Subject
Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering
Reference23 articles.
1. Fairley, T. E., and Griffin, M. J., 1989, “The Apparent Mass of the Seated Human Body: Vertical Vibration,” J. Biomech., 22, pp. 81–94.
2. Hinz, B., and Seidel, H., 1987, “The Nonlinearity of the Human Body’s Dynamic Response During Sinusoidal Whole Body Vibration,” Ind. Health, 25, pp. 169–181.
3. Mansfield, N. J., 1998, “Non-Linear Dynamic Response of the Seated Person to Whole-Body Vibration.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
4. Mansfield, N. J., and Griffin, M. J., 2000, “Non-Linear Response of the Abdomen to Whole Body Vertical Vibration,” J. Biomech., 33, pp. 933–941.
5. Matsumoto, Y., and Griffin, M. J., 1998, “Dynamic Response of the Standing Human Body Exposed to Vertical Vibration: Influence of Posture and Vibration Magnitude,” J. Sound Vib., 212, pp. 85–107.
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献