Learning an Eddy Viscosity Model Using Shrinkage and Bayesian Calibration: A Jet-in-Crossflow Case Study

Author:

Ray Jaideep1,Lefantzi Sophia2,Arunajatesan Srinivasan3,Dechant Lawrence3

Affiliation:

1. Sandia National Laboratories, MS 9159, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94550 e-mail:

2. Sandia National Laboratories, MS 9152, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94550 e-mail:

3. Sandia National Laboratories, MS 0825, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185 e-mail:

Abstract

We demonstrate a statistical procedure for learning a high-order eddy viscosity model (EVM) from experimental data and using it to improve the predictive skill of a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulator. The method is tested in a three-dimensional (3D), transonic jet-in-crossflow (JIC) configuration. The process starts with a cubic eddy viscosity model (CEVM) developed for incompressible flows. It is fitted to limited experimental JIC data using shrinkage regression. The shrinkage process removes all the terms from the model, except an intercept, a linear term, and a quadratic one involving the square of the vorticity. The shrunk eddy viscosity model is implemented in an RANS simulator and calibrated, using vorticity measurements, to infer three parameters. The calibration is Bayesian and is solved using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. A 3D probability density distribution for the inferred parameters is constructed, thus quantifying the uncertainty in the estimate. The phenomenal cost of using a 3D flow simulator inside an MCMC loop is mitigated by using surrogate models (“curve-fits”). A support vector machine classifier (SVMC) is used to impose our prior belief regarding parameter values, specifically to exclude nonphysical parameter combinations. The calibrated model is compared, in terms of its predictive skill, to simulations using uncalibrated linear and CEVMs. We find that the calibrated model, with one quadratic term, is more accurate than the uncalibrated simulator. The model is also checked at a flow condition at which the model was not calibrated.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference39 articles.

1. Poroseva, S., and Iaccarino, G., 2001, “Simulating Separated Flows Using the k−ε Model,” Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp. 375–383.https://web.stanford.edu/group/ctr/ResBriefs01/poroseva2.pdf

2. Development and Calibration of Algebraic Nonlinear Models for Terms in the Reynolds Stress Transport Equation;Phys. Fluids,2000

3. Separated Flow Computations Using the k−ε−v2 Model;AIAA J.,1995

4. Bayesian Parameter Estimation of a k-Epsilon Model for Accurate Jet-in-Crossflow Simulations;Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J.,2016

5. Development and Application of a Cubic Eddy-Viscosity Model of Turbulence;Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow,1996

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3