Double Wall Cooling of a Full Coverage Effusion Plate With Cross Flow Supply Cooling and Main Flow Pressure Gradient
Author:
Ligrani Phil1, Ren Zhong1, Vanga Sneha Reddy1, Allgaier Christopher2, Liberatore Federico3, Patel Rajeshriben3, Srinivasan Ram4, Ho Yin-Hsiang4
Affiliation:
1. Propulsion Research Center, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, 5000 Technology Drive, Olin B. King Technology Hall S236, Huntsville, AL 35899 2. ITLR University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 31, Stuttgart 70569, Germany 3. Combustion Engineering, Solar Turbines, Inc., 2200 Pacific Highway, Mail Zone E-4, San Diego, CA 92186-5376 4. Combustion Engineering, Solar Turbines, Inc., 2200 Pacific Highway, Mail Zone E-4, San Diego, CA 92186-5376
Abstract
Experimentally measured results are presented for different experimental conditions for a test plate with double wall cooling, composed of full-coverage effusion-cooling on the hot side of the plate, and cross-flow cooling on the cold side of the plate. The results presented are different from those from past investigations, because of the addition of a significant mainstream pressure gradient. Main stream flow is provided along a passage with a contraction ratio of 4, given by the ratio upstream flow area, to downstream flow area. With this arrangement, local blowing ratio decreases significantly with streamwise development along the test section, for every value of initial blowing ratio considered, where this initial value is determined at the most upstream row of effusion holes. Experimental data are given for a sparse effusion hole array. The experimental results are provided for mainstream Reynolds numbers of 92,400–96,600, and from 128,400 to 135,000, and initial blowing ratios of 3.3–3.6, 4.4, 5.2, 6.1–6.3, and 7.3–7.4. Results illustrate the effects of blowing ratio for the hot side and the cold side of the effusion plate. Of particular interest are values of line-averaged film cooling effectiveness and line-averaged heat transfer coefficient, which are generally different for contraction ratio of 4, compared to a contraction ratio of 1, because of different amounts and concentrations of effusion coolant near the test surface. In regard to cold-side measurements on the crossflow side of the effusion plate, line-averaged Nusselt numbers for contraction ratio 4 are often less than values for contraction ratio 1, when compared at the same main flow Reynolds number, initial blowing ratio, and streamwise location.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference21 articles.
1. Rogers, N., Ren, Z., Buzzard, W., Sweeney, B., Tinker, N., Ligrani, P. M., Hollingsworth, K. D., Liberatore, F., Patel, R., Ho, S., and Moon, H.-K., 2016, “Effects of Double Wall Cooling Configuration and Conditions on Performance of Full Coverage Effusion Cooling,” ASME Paper No. GT2016-56515. 10.1115/GT2016-56515 2. Combustor Liner Cooling Technology in Scope of Reduced Pollutant Formation and Rising Thermal Efficiencies,2001 3. A Review of Gas Turbine Effusion Cooling Studies;Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,2013 4. Film Cooling Effectiveness for Injection From Multirow Holes;ASME J. Eng. Power,1979 5. Martiny, M., Schulz, A., and Wittig, S., 1995, “Full-Coverage Film Cooling Investigation: Adiabatic Wall Temperatures and Flow Visualization,” ASME Paper No. 95-WA/HT-4.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|