Affiliation:
1. Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Abstract
This study examines how engineering design teams converge upon a solution to a design problem and how their solution is influenced by information given to them prior to problem solving. Specifically, the study considers the influence of the type of information received prior to problem solving on team convergence over time, as well as on the quality of produced solutions. To understand convergence, a model of the team members’ solution approach was developed through a cognitive engineering design study, specifically examining the effect of the introduction of a poor example solution or a good example solution prior to problem solving on the quality of the produced solutions. Latent semantic analysis was used to track the teams’ convergence, and the quality of design solutions was systematically assessed using pre-established criteria and multiple evaluators. Introducing a poor example solution was shown to decrease teams’ convergence over time, as well as the quality of their design solution; introducing a good example solution did not produce a statistically significant different effect on convergence compared with the control (with no prior example solution provided) but did lead to higher quality solutions.
Subject
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference34 articles.
1. PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices;Griffin;J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
2. The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation;Dahl;J. Mark. Res.
3. Variances in the Impact of Visual Stimuli on Design Problem Solving Performance;Goldschmidt;Des. Stud.
4. Modality and Representation in Analogy;Linsey;Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
Cited by
53 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献