Design Space Exploration for Quantifying a System Model’s Feasible Domain

Author:

Larson Brad J.12,Mattson Christopher A.32

Affiliation:

1. Mem. ASME Student

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602

3. Mem. ASME

Abstract

A major challenge in multidisciplinary system design is predicting the effects of design decisions at the point these decisions are being made. Because decisions at the beginning of system design, when the least is known about the new system, have the greatest impact on its final behavior, designers are increasingly interested in using compositional system models (system models created from independent models of system components) to validate design decisions early in and throughout system design. Compositional system models, however, have several failure modes that often result in infeasible or failed model evaluation. In addition, these models change frequently as designs are refined, changing the model domain (set of valid inputs and states). To compute valid results, the system model inputs and states must remain within this domain throughout simulation. This paper develops an algorithm to efficiently quantify the system model domain. To do this, we (1) present a formulation for system model feasibility and identify types of system model failures, (2) develop a design space exploration algorithm that quantifies the system model domain, and (3) illustrate this algorithm using a solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle model. This algorithm enables systematic improvements of compositional system model feasibility.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference31 articles.

1. DARPA, T. T. O. , 2009, “META,” DARPA Tactical Technology Office, Technical Report No. DARPA-BAA-10-21.

2. Gray, J., Moore, K. T., and Naylor, B. A., 2010, “OpenMDAO: An Open Source Framework for Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization,” AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference Proceedings.

3. Integrated Multidisciplinary Modeling, Virtual Design and Innovation;Hashemi

4. MDO is a State of Mind;Cramer

5. Thoughts on Model Validation for Engineering Design;Hazelrigg;Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3